Daily Mail

Bungling Labour

-

IN PROPOUNDIN­G his Utopian nationalis­ation view, Labour’s John McDonnell claims any takeover of a privatised utility company would be cost-free and shareholde­rs would be recompense­d with government bonds.

But this will place a cost burden on future generation­s.

Once a government creates an unsustaina­ble debt mountain, it will find further financial support is available only at a much higher rate of interest.

It is facile to suggest consumers will have any say in how much they pay. The power will be in the hands of the workers, who, as they have done so often under previous Labour administra­tions, will demand higher wages under the threat of strikes.

Just look at the power exercised by Aslef and the NUR in disputes with privatised regional rail companies. How will the annual ‘ profit’ be sufficient to meet the government bond interest, lower consumer bills and increase worker wages?

The bonds will have a marketable value, so it is not inconceiva­ble that a foreign government could acquire a controllin­g holding.

DONALD COLEMAN, Eynsham, Oxon.

THE Shadow Chancellor’s approach to the former nationalis­ed industries has much to commend it, but is too generous to shareholde­rs.

Government bonds don’t appear to take into account the huge sums paid to directors and shareholde­rs in salaries and dividends since they were privatised.

Privatisat­ion of natural public monopolies operated in the common interest effectivel­y turned customers into cash cows for a few people who had the interest, ability and funds to buy shares. The proposed

stakeholde­r-isation of these services will restore some justice, but the companies will be getting off lightly. GEOFF NAYLOR, Winchester, Hants. RENATIONAL­ISE all the utilities for nothing? Who worked out the numbers — Diane Abbott?

STEPHEN GERRARD, York.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom