Daily Mail

The wedding photograph­er who focused a little too much on the bridesmaid­s

- By Richard Marsden

THEY were supposed to be treasured mementoes of a newlywed couple’s big day.

But Steph and Paul Unwin were so disappoint­ed with their wedding photos, they took legal action.

A third of David Kilcourse’s pictures were blurred and he took far more of the bridesmaid­s than of the happy couple, including ‘inappropri­ate’ shots of their bottoms and cleavage.

Mr Kilcourse took 96 photos of the bridesmaid­s, but only 70 of the bride, just 11 of the groom and none of the groom’s parents.

The Unwins won £600 damages in the small claims court after Mr Kilcourse failed to file a defence

But he hit back yesterday, saying the wedding day was affected by bad weather and accusing the couple of ‘cropping’ photograph­s Unhappy couple: The Unwins on big day Snapper: David Kilcourse to claim he focused on the bridesmaid­s’ in as soon as the couple from bodies. Bollington, Cheshire, received the

Mrs Unwin, 29, and her 30-yearold first samples. husband, who have two young Mrs Unwin, a nurse, said: ‘When sons, paid Mr Kilcourse £550 to we got some of the pictures, I said take photos at their June 2015 to him, “is this all of them, because wedding. But disappoint­ment set I’m really disappoint­ed”. He said he took thousands of pictures. When we received them, he’d taken 1,636 images and 559 were out of focus. He called them “misfires”.

‘There were none of the in-laws, one of my parents and almost 100 of the two bridesmaid­s.

‘He took pictures of one of my bridesmaid’s breasts, some of her bum. There were more pictures of just the bridesmaid­s than anything else. I’m sure he was doing that on purpose. When he takes three pictures of someone’s bum, that’s not an accident.

‘We have so many moments missing from our big day.’

Mr Kilcourse, of Middleton, Greater Manchester, said he had closed his wedding photograph­y business in the wake of the dispute and had returned his fee to the Unwins. He said he did not attend court because the hearing was in Nottingham and it would have cost him ‘a fortune’ to attend.

 ??  ?? Zooming in: One of the 96 images of the bridesmaid­s, compared to 70 of the bride
Zooming in: One of the 96 images of the bridesmaid­s, compared to 70 of the bride
 ??  ?? Bum deal: A photo from the wedding
Bum deal: A photo from the wedding
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom