Daily Mail

Dirty hands but nowhere to wash them? We rate the hand sanitisers that will help you...

Clean up your ACT

- By ADRIAN MONTI

WAshING your hands isn’t always possible and many of us rely on hand sanitisers — gels, foams, sprays and wipes that contain antiseptic or disinfecta­nt chemicals, some ‘natural’, such as lavender.

sales of these products are rising significan­tly every year and the global market is expected to reach £1.4bn by 2024. But how good are they?

We asked Nigel Brown, a professor of molecular microbiolo­gy and former president of the Microbiolo­gy society, to assess a selection. We then rated them.

NO-GERMS INSTANT HAND SANITISER

210ml, £8.20, amazon.co.uk

CLAIM: This white foam sanitiser is said to kill 99.9 per cent of all germs in less than 15 seconds. It contains the antibacter­ial chemicals polyhexame­thylene biguanide and benzethoni­um chloride as well as aloe vera, chamomile and lavender.

VERDICT: I have no reason to doubt that this works in less than 15 seconds, as most hand sanitisers do — the majority of active chemicals work by breaking through the protective membranes around germs which effectivel­y kills them, and this is a very rapid process.

The active ingredient­s named here, polyhexame­thylene biguanide and benzethoni­um chloride, are powerful antimicrob­ials. The added essential oil extracts also have properties to slow the growth of microbes. however, I routinely avoid anything with benzethoni­um chloride in as it is what’s known as a quaternary ammonium (QA) — these are salts thought to contribute to antibiotic resistance.

studies suggest that bacteria can develop resistance to these chemicals and in doing so also become resistant to some commonly-prescribed antibiotic­s, such as ciprofloxa­cin.

The foam feels smooth on the skin but dries slightly sticky. 100ml, £1.30, most supermarke­ts CLAIM:

MILTON ANTIBACTER­IAL HAND GEL

This contains two types of alcohol — 60 per cent ethanol and 15 per cent propanol. As with most antibacter­ials, you put a thumbnail-sized amount in your palm and rub your hands together until dry.

VERDICT: Like many sanitisers this apparently kills 99.9 per cent of germs — though there may be some bacteria that are particular­ly resilient to sanitisers, including Bacillus cereus, which is a cause of food poisoning.

It is wise in the wider context to use soap and water when we can, as it avoids long-term exposure to certain active ingredient­s that could pose health risks, such as bacterial resistance as well as drying out skin. But using products such as a sanitiser from time to time is fine, particular­ly alcohol-based products like this that are well-establishe­d.

The alcohols in this are very effective antiseptic­s; together they break down the fatty membrane around the bacteria before killing them. Alcohol will dry the hands out, so try to moisturise afterwards.

DR BRONNER’S LAVENDER ORGANIC HAND SANITISER

59ml, £4.99, ocado.com CLAIM:

This organic spray contains ‘none of the nasty chemicals you find in convention­al sanitisers but is just as effective’. It’s made of lavender oil, glycerin and 62 per cent alcohol.

VERDICT: We don’t have a lot of data on natural ingredient­s and their ability to kill the vast majority of common bacteria and viruses, but lavender is thought to have some ability to kill bacteria.

Certainly the alcohol content in this is enough to kill bacteria by destroying the membrane around them. Alcohol will dry the hands but other ingredient­s such as glycerin will counteract this so your hands won’t feel too tough after repeated use. This is heavily scented, so might not be to everyone’s taste, nor work for sensitive skin.

SANI-HANDS ANTIBACTER­IAL HAND WIPES

Pack of 12 for 90p, most supermarke­ts CLAIM: These wipes are said to be ‘the most effective and hygienic alternativ­e to soap and water’. Their textured surface is impregnate­d with alcohol and antimicrob­ial benzalkoni­um chloride. VERDICT: Wipes may have the advantage over gels and foams as they make it easier to clean in between fingers and all over the hand to physically remove dirt and bacteria, and they have active chemicals working on them, too.

There’s little point in putting sanitiser on grubby hands as bacteria or viruses may be protected by a lump of dirt which chemicals won’t penetrate. If your hands are visibly dirty, scrub them clean.

I use these after using public toilets or transport (though I tend to wear gloves on trains and buses to avoid germs), as they contain effective antimicrob­ial chemicals and 60 per cent alcohol which kills bacteria. Benzalkoni­um chloride lingers on hands so would be effective for several hours after use. however, wipes are not good for the environmen­t as they’re slow to biodegrade.

VITAL BABY AQUAINT SANITISING WATER

50ml, £1.99, ocado.com CLAIM:

This is a mix of water and hypochloro­us acid, a natural acid based on a substance that the body produces to kill bacteria. It is said to be safe to use for everything from cleaning surfaces to babies’ skin — you could even drink it, the manufactur­er says. VERDICT: This is essentiall­y chlorine dissolved in water — the same principle used to clean swimming pools, though this is more diluted. hypochloro­us acid kills bacteria using mechanisms that are not entirely clear but probably involve damaging specific proteins — but I have not seen evidence that it works in the very diluted form used here.

ECOHYDRA ANTIBACTER­IAL HAND SANITISER

50ml, £2.49, Boots CLAIM:

Instead of alcohol this contains benzalkoni­um chloride and didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride which ‘kill 99.9999 per cent of bacteria’ and protects for four hours. It also claims to maintain the skin’s natural ph level.

VERDICT: This product contains two QA salts that attack bacteria but increase bacterial resistance, particular­ly with overuse.

As for killing 99.9999 per cent of bacteria, this is probably a marketing ploy and in practice wouldn’t provide significan­tly more protection than other products that kill 99 per cent.

Most antimicrob­ials work by destroying the membrane of germs but will not be successful against norovirus — you need alcohol for this, and so this is a downside to alcohol-free sanitisers. The claim to maintain the skin’s natural ph is irrelevant. It felt quite soapy and left my hands feeling sticky.

HIBISCRUB SKIN CLEANSER

250ml, £5.99, Boots CLAIM: Made with chlorhexid­ine gluconate, an antiseptic, that ‘binds to the skin and offers persistent protection for six hours’. You apply a few drops, rub in to skin and then rinse off with water. VERDICT: This is commonly used in hospitals before and after operations to prevent infections around wounds, but it is suitable for day-to-day use at home, too.

It is a clinically effective antiseptic and chlorhexid­ine is proven to disrupt cell membranes of bacteria and fungi, and can inactivate many viruses.

It also contains glycerol, an odourless liquid that keeps hands soft. It might not be practical to use on the go, you must rinse it off as it can dry skin out if left on.

BOOTS ANTI-VIRAL HAND FOAM

50ml, £3.19 CLAIM: The active ingredient­s in this alcohol-free foam are didecyldim­onium chloride and chlorhexid­ine digluconat­e. It is said to kill 99.9 per cent of harmful viruses including swine flu and bacteria such as e. coli, which can cause food poisoning. VERDICT: There’s no obvious benefit of foam over a gel, but some might find it easier to rub in all over their hands and between fingers. This contains two different QA salts that effectivel­y kill bacteria and viruses but also contribute to antibiotic resistance, so it may in effect worsen the incidence of these exact infections if they become resistant.

It claims to protect against e.coli for eight hours, but that would only be possible if the chemical stayed on that long, i.e. you didn’t wash or rub it off accidental­ly in the course of using your hands.

NEAL’S YARD REMEDIES ORGANIC DEFENCE HAND SPRAY

50ml, £6.50, ocado.com CLAIM: Another all- organic option, this contains alcohol and a number of essential oils including thyme and witch hazel, said to protect hands from germs and viruses. VERDICT: The packaging is vague about what concentrat­ions of essential oils are used, so how effective they are is unclear. I’m not sure why witch hazel is used here as there’s no evidence of it killing bacteria. The alcohol is an effective antibacter­ial that also helps the product dry on the skin quickly; while the essential oils will keep hands soft.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom