Daily Mail

Insurers vow to end rip-off premiums for loyal customers

As the first customers win refunds for unfair price hikes . . .

- By James Salmon Transport Editor

Insurance companies have vowed to stop ripping off loyal customers by ratcheting up their premiums every year.

in a stunning admission, the industry yesterday acknowledg­ed that firms had been ‘ unfairly penalising long-standing customers’ for years by charging them much more than new customers.

insurers have been heavily criticised for exploiting customers who do not shop around when their policy comes up for renewal by imposing steep – and seemingly arbitrary – hikes in their premiums. This allows them to subsidise cheap deals to attract new customers.

Drivers alone are paying an annual ‘loyalty tax’ of about £ 650 million a year on their motor insurance policies, according to comparison website moneysuper­market.com. Money Mail has also revealed that staying loyal to an insurer can cost families up to £1,000 a year when other policies – including home, travel and pet – are included.

Yesterday the Associatio­n of British insurers and the British insurance Brokers’ Associatio­n pledged to put an end to this scandal. The organisati­ons said their members have made a series of commitment­s including tackling ‘excessive difference­s between new customer premiums and subsequent renewal premiums that unfairly penalise long-standing customers’.

A new ‘ethos and approach’ to ensuring ‘better outcomes for long- standing customers’ will be written into firms’ procedures for calculatin­g premiums when they come up for renewal. Companies will have to clearly inform customers that their premium applies for only a year and may rise, and will have to review their approach to pricing for customers who have been with them for more than five years to ensure they get a ‘fair outcome’.

The ABi and BiBA will also have to publish a report within two years to show how firms have tried to tackle the probthey

‘Devil will be in the detail’

lem. But the ABi immediatel­y sparked fresh concerns by hinting that the result of a fairer system could be higher premiums for customers who do bother to shop around.

Chairman Andy Briggs said: ‘insurers do a great job for their customers, providing peace of mind and financial help when most need it, but the new renewal market simply does not work where loyal customers get charged much more than new customers.’

Hinting at more expensive policies for customers who shop around, he added: ‘Given many customers expect to get cheaper insurance when they shop around, there is no easy solution.’

Baroness Altmann, former pensions minister and consumer campaigner, said: ‘i welcome the fact that insurance companies finally recognise they need to reward loyal customers rather than penalise them. But the devil will be in the detail.’

Tory MP Steve Double said the pledge was ‘long overdue’, adding: ‘i hope existing customers will see the benefits of falling premiums.

‘But it would be a concern if this just means much higher premiums for new customers.’

HOMEOWNERS and motorists can claim compensati­on from their insurer if they are hit with unfair price hikes, Money Mail can reveal.

We have discovered that customers are winning refunds if they complain about rip-off quotes when renewing their cover.

Typically, customers who complain their premiums have risen for no good reason are fobbed off by insurers who claim it is up to them what they charge. Sometimes they give a flimsy excuse, such as tax increases. Other firms don’t even try to justify hikes.

But now it has emerged that if customers take these cases to the Financial Ombudsman they can get compensati­on.

One in four who go to the official disputes service are being awarded a partial refund. In some cases, insurers have been told to hand back more than £1,000.

The Ombudsman will only sanction a refund if it finds evidence your insurer has treated you unfairly. This includes where firms are unable to provide a clear reason for a price hike. They must also show they have not penalised you more severely than other customers in similar situations.

If you’re a long-term customer, you could get a refund if the firm failed to do enough to inform you of newer and cheaper policies.

The payouts are a big breakthrou­gh for Money Mail. We have repeatedly exposed in recent years how insurance firms overcharge millions of loyal customers by reserving their best deals for new ones.

The City watchdog is now investigat­ing the rip-off. And in another boost, the insurance industry yesterday published new guidelines that force firms to treat loyal customers more fairly. These include ensuring the policyhold­ers are not excessivel­y penalised and making it clear that discounts offered to new customers last just one year.

Today we call on anyone who thinks they’ve been overcharge­d for insurance to take their complaint to the Financial Ombudsman.

You can use our template letter, right, to demand a fair deal — and compensati­on.

Consumer expert Martyn James says: ‘For too long, many insurers have acted with impunity by hiking premiums each year, often without justificat­ion, and penalising loyal customers. The decision by the Ombudsman to address this is fantastic news and a great victory for Money Mail.’

About 200 people a month contact the Ombudsman about insurance prices. Most have seen huge hikes — despite never making a claim — and their circumstan­ces remaining the same as when they bought the policy.

Others are finding they are paying hundreds of pounds more than new customers for the same policy. Many are elderly or vulnerable. Until now, the only way to avoid this has been to shop around, which puts people who are uncomforta­ble with computers at a disadvanta­ge.

The Ombudsman once regarded insurance prices as a commercial decision for firms. But as complaints poured in, it began to ask insurers how they set premiums.

In a letter to a Money Mail reader, the disputes body says: ‘We’ve now started looking at some individual complaints against certain businesses. We hope to be able to expand this work out to other complaints over coming months.’

A spokeswoma­n for the Ombudsman says in most cases insurers are fair. And since 2017 insurers have had to print the premium customers paid the previous year on renewal notices. If people have renewed at least four times, letters must state they are unlikely to be getting the best deal without shopping around. If the Ombudsman decides the firm has unfairly hiked prices, it can tell the insurer to refund some of the premiums plus interest. Compensati­on for distress can also be awarded. In one case, a customer in her 40s, with the same insurer for 15 years, found that her provider was offering an identical home policy online for about £1,000 less. The Ombudsman said the insurer should have told her this and ordered the firm to refund the difference between what she had paid and would have been charged if offered the cheaper policy five years earlier, plus 8 pc a year interest. In another case, the nephew of a man in his 80s with dementia found his uncle was paying £1,400 for home insurance for a two-bed house after staying with the same provider for 15 years. It charged £300 online. The Ombudsman ruled that the uncle’s renewal letters had said that unless his circumstan­ces had changed he didn’t need to act — which was misleading. The firm should also have recognised the uncle may have needed help to make an informed choice from the fifth year onwards — when the price began to rise by 15 pc a year. It ordered the insurer to refund the difference between the price paid after five years and renewal quote, plus interest and £ 150 compensati­on for distress. Chief ombudsman Caroline Wayman says: ‘In a small, but significan­t, number of cases, we’ve seen that people are paying the price for loyalty in a way that’s simply not fair.’ An Associatio­n of British Insurers spokesman says: ‘We are taking action on excessive difference­s between new customer premiums and renewals and want to see a marked improvemen­t for longstandi­ng customers.’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom