Daily Mail

Unacceptab­le! MPs blast fat cat pay at disabled car scheme CAR SCHEME FOR THE DISABLED PAYS BOSS £1.7MILLION

- By Sam Greenhill Chief Reporter

THE Motability disabled car scheme is paying bosses ‘totally unacceptab­le’ salaries – and making banks richer too, an inquiry concludes today.

A damning report by MPs backs a Daily Mail investigat­ion that exposed scandalous use of public money at the charitable scheme.

The inquiry found Motability Operations’ chief executive Mike Betts – paid £1.7million a year – and fellow directors were pocketing salaries ‘totally out of whack with reality’.

Motability arranges cars for disabled people in exchange for their state disability allowance.

But the Mail revealed in February it is paying huge salaries and hoarding £2.4billion of public money.

Our investigat­ion led to directors being hauled before MPs on the work and pensions and Treasury committees. Today their reports find:

Mr Betts enjoyed a 78 per cent pay increase in nine years – despite running a taxpayer-supported monopoly;

Banks are creaming off £700,000 a year from their involvemen­t;

Motability’s reserves are ‘out of proportion to the risks it faces’ – and it has so much spare cash it could afford to cut prices;

It gets £700million a year in tax relief – handing it an easy ‘monopoly’ on public money for disabled motorists.

The MPs called on the National Audit Office (NAO) to conduct an examinatio­n of Motability’s accounts going back years.

Labour MP Frank Field, chairman of the work and pensions committee, said: ‘Huge thanks to the Mail for making this an issue, which the committees quickly and willingly took up.

‘The levels of pay pocketed by [Motablity’s] executives and the cash reserves it is hoarding are totally out of whack with reality

Paid £1.7m: Chief executive Mike Betts with wife Julie of its position in the market. thew Hamilton- James, 44, That one member of staff is paid earned £550,000 last year. over ten times what the Prime Motability Operations – a limited Minister earns is one example of firm operating under contract where Motability needs to get a to the Motability charity – grip of itself and realise the privileged says pay is set by comparing position in which it salaries with bosses of FTSE 250 trades.’ firms. But the MPs said: ‘Given

When the Mail exposed the its existence as a taxpayersu­pported scandal, we revealed how Mr monopoly, the zero Betts, 56, lives in a £5million flat competitio­n it faces for customers, overlookin­g Tower Bridge. and the context of restrained

Former second-in- command welfare spending in which it David Gilman, 66 – whose flat is operates, the level of executive just across the Thames from Mr pay is totally unacceptab­le.’ Betts’ – was paid £1.1million in For the past decade, Motability 2016, and his replacemen­t Mat- has hoarded £200million a year in unspent funds, giving it what the MPs termed ‘ an exponentia­l increase in reserves’ to £2.4billion.

Nicky Morgan MP, chairman of the Treasury committee, said: ‘High levels of executive pay and significan­t financial reserves are difficult to square with the honourable objectives of the scheme. It seems that Motability may have lost its way. [The government] should ask the NAO to carry out a full inquiry into the value for money of the Motability scheme.’

The Government confessed it knew for at least five years that Motability had received too much public money. Sarah Newton, minister for disabled people, told MPs ministers had ‘repeatedly’ challenged Motability bosses about hoarding such vast reserves.

Charlie Elphicke MP told the Motability bosses their operation was ‘like a casino’.

Under the scheme, customers agree to their £58-a-week mobility benefits being paid directly to the firm, which gives them a vehicle with insurance, tax, servicing, and breakdown cover included. Motability highlighte­d that the report recognised the scheme provides an ‘extremely valuable service’ to disabled people, and said it would welcome an NAO investigat­ion.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The Mail, February 6
The Mail, February 6

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom