Daily Mail

ONE BY ONE, THE THIRTY BLUNDERS THAT LED TO DISASTER

- By Arthur Martin and Daniel Martin

FIVE experts yesterday highlighte­d an incredible litany of safety breaches which led to the devastatin­g inferno at Grenfell Tower.

Damning reports published on the first day of formal evidence at the inquiry into the disaster highlighte­d a catalogue of blunders in refurbishm­ent, maintenanc­e and fire response at the tower block.

Here the Mail outlines these 30 failings in full:

1 There is no statutory requiremen­t for central alarm systems in tower blocks because it would conflict with the policy of residents ‘staying put’ in flats. 2 No sprinklers.

3 Firefighte­rs should have directed their hoses on or above the fire, but videos show they were being targeted below.

4 A pipe system to get water up the 24-storey block could not cope and was overloaded – leaving the upper floors, where most people died, vulnerable.

5 Water pipe failure meant fire crews had to pump their own water onto the fire.

6 The failure of the fire lift system delayed firefighte­rs.

7 Advice for residents to stay put in the event of a fire was futile within half an hour of the blaze breaking out – but still slavishly adhered to for another 80 minutes.

8 Combustibl­e cladding panels and insulation systems were ruled ‘substantia­lly to blame’.

9 Two types of cladding and four different insulation layers did not comply with building regulation­s.

10 Two cavity barriers did not have the required fire performanc­e certificat­es.

11 The cladding produced toxic smoke that slowed the firefighte­rs as it forced them to wear breathing apparatus.

12 Designers and builders had no idea how the cladding system would perform in a fire as no tests were carried out.

13 Neither the London Fire Brigade nor Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisati­on, which was responsibl­e for Grenfell, carried out risk assessment­s of the cladding.

14 Flammable aluminium panels fixed to the tower and on more than 300 other blocks across England were never subjected to a full British Standard fire test.

15 Stairwell was too narrow and soon became impassable thanks to smoke, darkness, firefighte­rs and distressed and dying victims.

16 An architectu­ral feature called a ‘crown’ at the top of the building caught fire and also helped the blaze spread horizontal­ly.

17 Design of tower blocks is supposed to ‘compartmen­talise’ fires into individual flats – but this was not effective at Grenfell.

18 Ventilatio­n system for removing smoke from lobbies failed.

19 Fire stops between each floor were not installed correctly, meaning nothing stopped the blaze leaping up the tower.

20 A ‘culture of noncomplia­nce’ appeared to exist in the maintenanc­e of the tower.

21 Most of the fire doors leading to the 120 flats were relatively new but did not comply with building regulation­s.

22 Some doors failed within 20 minutes even though they should have blocked fire for an hour. 23 Doors were fitted with a variety of different locks, hinges and letter plates that could significan­tly reduce fire resistance.

24 Forty-eight doors had glazing that failed and allowed flames and smoke to pass directly through.

25 Fourteen of the doors to Grenfell’s flats were of unknown origin.

26 Some doors designed to ‘self-close’ failed to do so, allowing the fire to spread more quickly.

27 Doors were left open by fire hoses and in one case, a body.

28 Defective windows installed in the 2012-16 refurbishm­ent allowed the fire to spread from a single kitchen to the external cladding through gaps in frames.

29 Windows had no fireresist­ant cavity barriers encasing them and these openings were surrounded by combustibl­e material.

30 During refurbishm­ent, the windows were fitted in an ‘improvised manner’ that may have made them less safe.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom