Daily Mail

There’s no more time for fudging on Brexit — D (for decision) Day is here

- PETER OBORNE

TWo years have passed since the British people voted to leave the European Union. Since then, little progress has been made towards agreeing terms for Brexit, and now talks have all but reached stalemate.

This is partly because two separate sets of negotiatio­ns have been under way.

on the one hand, there have been the formal talks between Britain and the European Union, led by its chief negotiator Michel Barnier.

our own negotiator has been Cabinet minister David Davis. However, he has struggled to master his brief.

In a measure of the contempt in which he is held by some, one Irish minister recently ridiculed him as the ‘tea-boy’ for oliver Robbins, the civil servant heading Davis’s Brexit team.

But Mr Davis is not fundamenta­lly to blame. Divisions within the Tory Party mean that Theresa May’s deeply divided Cabinet has been negotiatin­g with itself over the correct strategy.

on one side there are the Brexiteers, led by Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, who wants a clean break from Europe.

on the other side we have the Remainers, led by Chancellor Philip Hammond and Business Secretary Greg Clark, who are determined to maintain a version of the customs union with the EU.

ASA RESULT, Michel Barnier has been able to run rings around Britain’s dysfunctio­nal and divided team. The result: deadlock — and time is running out terrifying­ly fast.

There are just nine months to go before — under the terms of Article 50 — Britain leaves the EU. And there are only six weeks of negotiatin­g time left for us to strike a deal with Brussels before the final shape is decided.

This is the very troubling background to next week’s crucial Chequers summit, for which Mrs May has summoned her Cabinet in the hope of agreeing a common strategy on Britain’s future trading relationsh­ip with Europe.

The purpose of this meeting is to attempt to bind the Remainers and Brexiteers together in a single negotiatin­g strategy we can take to Brussels to press our case. So far, the Prime Minister has Sellotaped her Cabinet together with a succession of fudges and compromise­s with both sides that have kept her in office. But such a shambolic approach is no longer in the national interest.

From next week onwards, Britain needs a clear, coherent strategy which will be set out in the longdelaye­d White Paper, due to be published on July 9. And in a chilling article yesterday Lord Bridges, the former Brexit minister, warned of the consequenc­es if the May Cabinet fails to reach an agreement.

He wrote that ‘there’s a danger the UK will have to agree to a withdrawal treaty full of meaningles­s waffle on our future relationsh­ip with the EU. With so little leverage in the next phase, the negotiatio­ns would become a rout’.

That’s why compromise will be necessary on all sides next week. But this means Mrs May will have to change her political strategy.

Until now, she’s done everything she can to avert the threat of resignatio­n by senior ministers in order to keep her Cabinet together.

Now she must ask those ministers to dip their hands in the blood and give her their full support. If they refuse, they must be sacked.

A well- placed source inside Downing Street told me yesterday that the chances of Britain failing to strike a deal at all with Europe are now high.

SoMElook fondly on the idea of a no-deal Brexit. They believe it will liberate Britain from Europe. I wish matters were that simple.

Some British businesses have warned that the consequenc­es of leaving without a deal, and instead reverting to World Trade organisati­on rules, would risk chaos — especially at a moment when U. S. President Donald Trump seems set on tearing up the WTo altogether.

It’s a gamble that should only be taken as a last resort.

I also agree with those who say that Britain must neverthele­ss hold out the possibilit­y of no deal in order to strengthen our negotiatin­g hand. But Mrs May has palpably failed up to now to plan for the consequenc­es of such an outcome (though the reluctance of Chancellor Hammond to pledge financial support for such planning has not helped).

For all these concerns, this is not a moment for despair, and there’s no doubt we can thrive outside the EU.

This week we were given a brilliant example of a post-Brexit future with the announceme­nt that BAE Systems has won a multi-billion-pound deal to build nine new warships for the Australian navy ( beating European competitio­n).

However, the dangers are also very high. In many ways, for the past two years we’ve had a phoney war over Brexit. Now it’s over and the whiff of grapeshot is in the air.

That’s why next week’s Chequers pow-wow is so crucial. The time for dithering and fudge is over.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom