Daily Mail

Why the longer we are in a queue, the more likely it is we’ll stay put

- By Victoria Allen Science Correspond­ent

AFTER waiting 15 minutes in a queue, a good many of us will decide to stay put – even when it may be better to leave.

The usual justificat­ion is that having waited so long already it is probably worth staying, despite all the foot-tapping and sighing.

Now scientists have found the reason or this seemingly illogical decision. It appears we may be hardwired to make bad decisions simply because we have already started a course of action.

Humans, mice and rats were all found to carry on waiting for a reward after it did not make sense to do so. In the case of humans, researcher­s at the University of Minnesota tested this by making 65 volunteers wait for different entertainm­ent videos. They were far more likely to stay put, rather than move on to a different video, if they had waited a long time already. Dr David Redish, a co-author of the study said: ‘We see this behaviour in real life just as much as [in] an experiment.’

The study, published in the journal Science, is based around the idea of a ‘sunk cost’ – an investment of time which cannot be recovered.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom