Daily Mail

Corbyn poses existentia­l threat to our community say 3 Jewish newspapers

- By Ian Drury Home Affairs Editor

In an unpreceden­ted step, the Jewish News, Jewish Chronicle and Jewish Telegraph published a joint front page editorial voicing fears that power could be handed to a man who has ‘contempt for Jews and Israel’. THE Jewish community would face an ‘existentia­l threat’ if Jeremy Corbyn became prime minister, the country’s three main Jewish newspapers warn today.

It highlighte­d how the ‘stain and shame of anti-Semitism’ had flourished in the Labour Party since Mr Corbyn became leader in 2015.

And they singled out Labour’s ‘sinister’ failure to adopt the internatio­nally accepted definition of anti-Semitism in its new code of conduct.

The decision has fuelled concerns that the watered- down definition means activists could avoid being punished for making slurs such as comparing the actions of Israel to those of the Nazis.

Underneath the headline United We Stand, the papers condemned Mr Corbyn for having a ‘default blindness’ to the fears of the Jewish community. They said they had teamed up because of the ‘existentia­l threat to Jewish life in this country that would be posed by a Jeremy Corbyn-led government’.

The article was written over a photograph of placard-waving campaigner­s against Labour anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial in March. It said there had been ‘ many alarming lows’ of antiSemiti­sm in Labour. These included human rights campaigner Shami Chakrabart­i being handed a peerage weeks after publishing a report that allegedly whitewashe­d antiSemiti­sm in the party.

The article also condemned Labour for reinstatin­g Ken Livingston­e after he had been suspended for claiming Hitler had once supported Zionism.

But it said the ‘stubborn refusal’ to accept the Internatio­nal Holocaust Remembranc­e Alliance’s definition of anti-Semitism – which saw Labour MP Dame Margaret Hodge, who lost family in the Holocaust, to brand Mr Corbyn a ‘racist’ – as the ‘most sinister yet’. The definition is recognised internatio­nally and has been accepted by the Government and 130 councils. But Labour left out four key examples of anti-Semitism relating to Israel. This was a cynical attempt to avoid the need to expel ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of Labour and Momentum members, said the newspapers.

The article added that if Labour failed to implement the definition in full it would be seen ‘ by all decent people as an institutio­nally racist party’.

Labour has been engulfed in claims of anti-Semitism under Mr Corbyn’s leadership following a spate of attacks on Jewish people and supporters, including Labour MPs. At last year’s party conference a fringe event speaker said people should be able to question whether the Holocaust took place.

Prior to her confrontat­ion with Mr Corbyn last week, in March Dame Margaret branded him ‘the poster boy of anti-Semites everywhere’.

Last night, Gideon Falter, chairman of the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, said: ‘We hear from members of our community constantly that were Jeremy Corbyn to become prime minister, they would take the drastic step of leaving the country. Jeremy Corbyn has displayed utter contempt for the Jewish community ... the Labour Party is now so institutio­nally anti-Semitic under Jeremy Corbyn that the Jewish community considers it to be a threat to our very future in this country.’

In January, the Community Security Trust, a charity that monitors anti-Semitic abuse, said it recorded 1,382 hate crimes last year - 3 per cent more than in 2016. It was the highest figure since records began 34 years ago. It said the increase followed ‘unpreceden­ted publicity’ about controvers­ies involving Labour Party.

Last night Labour MP Wes Streeting said of the editorial: ‘This is a shameful episode in the history of the Labour Party and we need to put it right.’

The Labour Party said: ‘Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party are fully committed to the support, defence and celebratio­n of the Jewish community and its organisati­ons. The next Labour government poses no threat of any kind whatsoever to Jewish people. The security and wellbeing of Jewish people is a priority for our party.

‘We understand the strong concerns raised in the Jewish community and are seeking to engage with communal organisati­ons to build trust and confidence in our party.’

‘He has displayed utter contempt’

FOR a party with a proud history of fighting racism, this was another very dark day.

Under the headline ‘ United we stand’, three leading Jewish newspapers publish the same front-page editorial condemning Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s appalling tolerance of anti-Semitism.

The Jewish News, Jewish Chronicle and Jewish Telegraph jointly argue that the ‘stain and shame of anti-Semitism has coursed through Her Majesty’s Opposition’ since Mr Corbyn became leader in 2015. The Mail wholeheart­edly agrees.

As a result, a party that was once the ‘natural home’ for many Jews ‘has seen its values and integrity eroded by Corbynite contempt for Jews and Israel’, they say. Who could argue with that? Or their insistence that Mr Corbyn has a ‘default blindness to the Jewish community’s fears’?

But the most worrying claim of all is that Mr Corbyn in power would amount to an ‘existentia­l threat to Jewish life’ in Britain.

How chilling, and how horrifying, that in 21st century Britain, a minority group which has suffered appalling oppression through the ages fears for its very future under a Labour government.

Mr Corbyn, who never fails to burnish his anti-racist credential­s, has had three years to match his actions to his words.

But while promising a kinder, gentler politics, he has allowed intoleranc­e and hatred to run riot. He has presided over a whitewash internal review of anti-Semitism, appeared on dark corners of the internet where Jew-hatred is common, and ignored vitriolic outbursts from his hard-Left allies.

Now he stands accused of turning Labour into an ‘institutio­nally racist party’. In recent weeks, party bosses rejected the full Internatio­nal Holocaust Remembranc­e Alliance definition of anti-Semitism – one accepted by the police, the Crown Prosecutio­n Service, and more than 130 councils – and imposed its own, watereddow­n version.

It was this decision which prompted Dame Margaret Hodge, courageous­ly, to call Mr Corbyn ‘an anti-Semite and a racist’ to his face. Absurdly, she now faces disciplina­ry action while Mr Corbyn’s hatemonger­s can carry on regardless. How utterly shaming.

 ??  ?? TODAY, Britain’s three leading Jewish newspapers – Jewish News, Jewish Chronicle and Jewish Telegraph – take the unpreceden­ted step of speaking as one by publishing the same front page. We do so because of the existentia­l threat to Jewish life in this country that would be posed by a Jeremy Corbyn-led government. We do so because the party that was, until recently, the natural home for our community has seen its values and integrity eroded by Corbynite contempt for Jews and Israel. The stain and shame of antiSemiti­sm has coursed through Her Majesty’s Opposition since Jeremy Corbyn became leader in 2015. From Chakrabart­i to Livingston­e, there have been many alarming lows. Last week’s stubborn refusal to adopt the full Internatio­nal Holocaust Remembranc­e Alliance’s definition of anti-Semitism, provoking Labour MP Dame Margaret Hodge to call her leader an anti-Semite to his face, was the most sinister yet. Labour has diluted the IHRA definition, accepted in full by the government and more than 130 local councils, deleting and amending four key examples of anti-Semitism relating to Israel. Under its adapted guidelines,
TODAY, Britain’s three leading Jewish newspapers – Jewish News, Jewish Chronicle and Jewish Telegraph – take the unpreceden­ted step of speaking as one by publishing the same front page. We do so because of the existentia­l threat to Jewish life in this country that would be posed by a Jeremy Corbyn-led government. We do so because the party that was, until recently, the natural home for our community has seen its values and integrity eroded by Corbynite contempt for Jews and Israel. The stain and shame of antiSemiti­sm has coursed through Her Majesty’s Opposition since Jeremy Corbyn became leader in 2015. From Chakrabart­i to Livingston­e, there have been many alarming lows. Last week’s stubborn refusal to adopt the full Internatio­nal Holocaust Remembranc­e Alliance’s definition of anti-Semitism, provoking Labour MP Dame Margaret Hodge to call her leader an anti-Semite to his face, was the most sinister yet. Labour has diluted the IHRA definition, accepted in full by the government and more than 130 local councils, deleting and amending four key examples of anti-Semitism relating to Israel. Under its adapted guidelines,

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom