Daily Mail

Woman who sued elite dating agency after it failed to find her a wealthy man wins £13k

- Daily Mail Reporter

A DIVORCEE who sued an elite dating agency after failing to find a new partner has won £13,000 in damages.

Tereza Burki approached Seventy Thirty in pursuit of ‘the man of her dreams’, the High Court heard.

The 47-year- old businesswo­man said the agency assured her it could introduce her to ‘creme de la creme’ matches.

She asked it to help her find a wealthy boyfriend who was open to having a child.

But after she failed to find love, she sued the London-based agency for deceit and misreprese­ntation – and sought damages for distress and the return of her £12,600 membership fee.

In return, the dating agency sued Miss Burki for libel and malicious falsehood over two reviews she had posted online.

Yesterday Judge Richard Parkes ruled Miss Burki had been given a false representa­tion by the agency’s then-managing director Lemarc Thomas and ordered that it return her fee and give her £500 for the ‘ disappoint­ment and sadness’ she had suffered. He said: ‘This case is about a woman looking for romantic happiness who says she was tricked into shopping in the wrong place.’

Miss Burki, from Chelsea, first approached Seventy Thirty – which describes itself as an ‘exclusive matchmakin­g and elite introducti­on service’ – in 2013. She said she wanted a ‘sophistica­ted gentleman’, ideally employed in the finance industry, who led a ‘wealthy lifestyle’. Most importantl­y, the mother of three said any matches must be open to having children.

Judge Parkes said Mr Thomas claimed there was a ‘substantia­l’ number of active wealthy male members who were a sufficient match for Miss Burki’s requiremen­ts, ‘which were not modest’.

But this was ‘false and misleading’, as of all its members, only about 100 were men actively looking for love. He said this ‘cannot by any stretch of the imaginatio­n be described as a substantia­l number’.

The judge said Mr Thomas had knowingly given her a ‘wholly false impression’, but added he had not found that Seventy Thirty was a ‘fundamenta­lly dishonest or fraudulent operation’.

He awarded Seventy Thirty £5,000 for libel relating to a Google review posted in April 2016 by Miss Burki but otherwise dismissed their claims.

After the case, Seventy Thirty founder Susie Ambrose, 52, told Mail Online that Miss Burki’s expectatio­ns had been ‘lofty and unrealisti­c’. ‘She assumed it would be like internet dating, but we are a niche, exclusive agency,’ she said.

‘We are not going to have thousands of members because there simply aren’t thousands of single, wealthy, high-calibre prospects out there.’

 ??  ?? Left distressed: Tereza Burki outside court
Left distressed: Tereza Burki outside court
 ??  ?? Agency founder: Susie Ambrose
Agency founder: Susie Ambrose

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom