Daily Mail

Doctors ‘blamed victims to cover up blood scandal’

Patients branded alcoholics or drug addicts

- By Josh White

Tainted blood scandal ‘is the worst tragedy in NHS history’

victims of the tainted blood scandal were labelled ‘drug addicts or secret alcoholics’ as doctors tried to cover up the role of the NHs, an inquiry heard yesterday.

Around 30,000 patients were said to have been given unsafe blood products in the 1970s and 1980s, exposing them to hepatitis c and Hiv. some 3,000 are thought to have since died.

At the second day of the public inquiry’s preliminar­y hearings, chairman sir Brian Langstaff was repeatedly told medical records of those affected had been ‘destroyed or redacted’.

sir Brian was urged by lawyers and individual victims to expose an alleged cover-up at a Department of Health steeped in a ‘culture of losing records’.

David Lock, Qc, acting for 241 of those affected, emphasised that many victims had been accused of ‘drug use, alcoholism or sexual promiscuit­y’, with the NHs apparently desperate to wash its hands of any responsibi­lity.

And sam stein Qc, for four core participan­ts, suggested criminal offences of grievous bodily harm, murder and conspiracy to murder could have been committed. mr stein added: ‘it is clear that those responsibl­e for the criminal infection of people through the supply of contaminat­ed blood should be prosecuted. those people who wiped out thousands of haemophili­acs and other people should pay for their crimes.’

Karon monaghan Qc, representi­ng another four key participan­ts, said they believed there was ‘clearly a cover-up’ and demanded the Government produce a schedule of what documentat­ion had been destroyed, and why.

the shredding of potentiall­y key evidence was initially blamed on an ‘inexperien­ced member of staff’, but the true extent of the loss of evidence has never been properly examined.

Department­al papers, apparently relating to ‘the extent to which ministers were made fully aware of the facts’ during the 1970s were also destroyed.

mr Lock added: ‘We understand that there are reports that the private papers of the former secretary of state, Dr David Owen, [now Lord Owen] were part of this destructio­n exercise.’

He repeated a previous assertion that Department of Health paperwork was apparently destroyed ‘with intent, in order to draw a line under this disaster’. the tv broadcaste­r and author Lord Winston has previously called the scandal ‘the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHs’.

many of the infected products, often used for treating haemophili­a or haemorrhag­es, were derived from the blood of drug addicts, prostitute­s and convicts from the Us.

Besides doctored medical

Yesterday’s Daily Mail records and inaccurate death certificat­es, many victims believe government officials deliberate­ly destroyed evidence relating to groups like the Advisory committee on the virologica­l safety of Blood.

Aidan O’Neill, Qc, represente­d 250 scots affected, as well as Haemophili­a scotland and the scottish infected Blood Forum.

He said that when victims sought treatment, they were ‘stigmatise­d by healthcare profession­als, blamed for their conditions, accused of being drug addicts or secret alcoholics’.

mr O’Neill added: ‘their medical records during their lives and sometimes their death certificat­es baselessly recorded and maintained these false accusation­s, based on illfounded assumption­s and prejudice and ignorance.

‘they asserted that the patients were themselves to blame.

‘such records did not acknowledg­e that the state had caused these conditions by its own reckless and abusive conduct.

‘this disaster ruined lives and ruined families.’

Lloyd Williams, Qc, for 107 victims, also questioned the role of Lord Owen – health minister in 1974 – who pushed for Britain to start producing its own blood products. the inquiry was asked to investigat­e what ‘made him so concerned regarding the contaminat­ion of [blood products] purchased from America that he directed that measures should be put in place to become self-sufficient within five years’.

the inquiry continues.

‘This disaster ruined families’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom