Cambridge orders inquiry into its ‘links to slave trade’

CAMBRIDGE is to carry out a two-year inquiry into its links with the slave trade.

It will investigate how the university benefited from the Atlantic trade in Africans in the 18th century, and how its scholars contributed to ‘repugnant’ views on race.

The project paves the way for the university to follow other public bodies in apologising for their part in the slave era. Students have been campaigning to ‘decolonise the curriculum’, complaining that it is too dominated by white writers. Cambridge has also been accused of failing to attract enough black students.

Vice chancellor Stephen Toope said: ‘There is growing public and academic interest in the links between the older British universities and the slave trade, and it is only right that Cambridge should look into its own exposure to the profits of coerced labour during the colonial period. We cannot change the past, but nor should we seek to hide from it.

‘I hope this process will help the university understand and acknowledge its role during that dark phase of human history.’

The inquiry will explore university archives and records elsewhere to uncover how Cambridge may have ‘gained from slavery and the exploitation of labour’.

This would include financial bequests to departments, libraries and museums.

It will also investigate the extent to which scholars might have ‘reinforced and validated racebased thinking’ between the 18th and early 20th century. An advisory group has been asked to recommend ways to ‘ publicly acknowledge’ past links to slavery and to ‘address its impact’.

The eight-member group overseeing the work is being led by Martin Millett, who is the Laurence professor of classical archaeology. It will draw its membership from academic departments across the university and will be supported by two post-doctorate researchers, with a report due to be finished in 2021.

Professor Millett said: ‘This will be an evidence-led and thorough piece of research into the University of Cambridge’s historical relationship with the slave trade and other forms of coerced labour.

‘We cannot know at this stage what exactly it will find but it is reasonable to assume that, like many large British institutions during the colonial era, the university will have benefited directly or indirectly from, and contributed to, the practices of the time.

‘The benefits may have been financial or through other gifts.

‘But the panel is just as interested in the way scholars at the university helped shape public and political opinion, supporting, reinforcing and sometimes contesting racial attitudes which are repugnant in the 21st century.’

WHAT is the purpose of Cambridge University’s decision to launch a two-year inquiry into how it benefited from slavery?

No doubt it did receive gifts and endowments from people involved in that ghastly trade but that was centuries ago. Are they planning to give them back?

Slavery was an abomination, but it was hardly a British invention. Great African empires enslaved conquered peoples long before Europeans arrived. And although we must accept responsibility for our part in this dark chapter, this country also brought an end to the Atlantic slave trade.

If this inquiry were purely an academic exercise, it would be uncontroversial. But with the shrill ‘Decolonise’ movement raging through our universities, it’s sure to end in cringing self-flagellation.

Yes, we must learn from the past. But seeking to judge such distant events by today’s moral standards is simply absurd.