Daily Mail

THOMAS COOK FAT CATS HAD CREAMED OFF £47M

++ Customers demand travel bosses return bonuses ++ PM fury at collapse ++ Britons ‘held hostage’ in hotels

- By Mario Ledwith and Tom Witherow

BOSSES at Thomas Cook pocketed a £47million pay bonanza as the firm headed for the rocks.

Last night, after the travel operator was dramatical­ly declared bankrupt, furious

customers demanded executives hand back some of their ‘rewards for failure’.

Boris Johnson also intervened, asking why directors had paid themselves large sums as the company went ‘down the tubes’.

Ministers have opened an investigat­ion into how Thomas Cook sank under £1.6billion of debt.

Up to a million customers have seen their holidays thrown into chaos by the collapse of the 178year-old firm. Many are unlikely to receive compensati­on.

The UK authoritie­s yesterday began to fly home the first of the estimated 156,000 Britons

‘They should not get a penny’

stranded abroad. The operation – the country’s largest ever peacetime repatriati­on – will cost taxpayers an estimated £100million. Amid travel mayhem around the globe:

Despairing holidaymak­ers had to barricade themselves in hotel rooms after staff threatened to throw them out unless they personally paid thousands of pounds owed by Thomas Cook;

Others chose to flee their hotels after being hit with impromptu demands for huge bills they thought they had paid;

There were long delays at airports as the Civil Aviation Authority began repatriati­on;

Up to 500,000 Thomas Cook customers from other countries, mostly Germany and in Scandinavi­a, are also affected;

Business Secretary Andrea Leadsom asked the Insolvency Service to launch an investigat­ion;

Rival airlines were accused by some customers of behaving like vultures by hiking their prices to cash in on desperate customers;

City investors who bet against the firm were set for a £250million windfall;

A row broke out over whether the Government should have intervened;

Some selfless Thomas Cook staff turned out to help customers, with no prospect of being paid.

Thomas Cook folded in the early hours of yesterday putting 22,000 jobs at risk worldwide, including 9,000 in the UK and signalling the closure of more than 600 agency branches.

A Daily Mail audit yesterday revealed that the three chief executives who have led the beleaguere­d firm since 2007 raked in more than £36.1million in pay and bonuses.

Peter Fankhauser, the Swiss chief executive taken on in the immediate years before its collapse yesterday, has taken home £8.4millon since 2014, including £4.6million in bonus payments linked to performanc­e.

His predecesso­r Harriet Green, who ran the firm between 2012 and 2014 and faced controvers­y over an £80,000 yearly hotel and travel bill, took home almost £11million in total pay. In 2015 alone, she received £6.3million despite only working for two months of that financial year.

The businesswo­man ultimately donated a third of a £5.6million share award to charities picked by the parents of Bobby and Christi Shepherd, who died of carbon monoxide on a 2006 Thomas Cook holiday in Corfu.

The most controvers­ial payments were received by Manny Fontenla-Novoa, who saw the company’s share price drasticall­y tumble under his leadership between 2007 and 2011.

The Spanish-British businessma­n’s huge pay packages totalling £16.8million led the company to introduce internal ‘clawback’ measures in 2012 that could see exaggerate­d bonuses recouped.

Former chief financial officer, Michael Healey, took home a total of £8.3million between 2012 and 2018 in salary and bonuses. And non-executive chairman Frank Meysman earned £2.2million in salary and benefits between 2018 and 2012, totalling almost £47million for the five.

The Prime Minister intervened during an interview at the British consulate general’s residence in New York. He said: ‘ How can we make sure that tour operators take proper precaution­s with their business models where you don’t end up with a situation where the taxpayer, the state, is having to step in and bring people home?

‘I have questions for one about whether it’s right that the directors, or whoever, the board, should pay themselves large sums when businesses can go down the tubes like that.’

In a letter to the Insolvency Service, Miss Leadsom ordered scrutiny of ‘ whether any action by directors has caused detriment to creditors or to the pension schemes’. A senior government source said Thomas Cook’s bosses had ‘ legitimate questions to answer’ about their stewardshi­p of the company.

Tom Patrick, 69, from Cookstown, Northern Ireland, who was on holiday with his wife Valerie, was one of the devastated customers.

‘They ripped the company apart but they’ll be home and dry while their employees suffer and thousands of holidays are ruined,’ he said. ‘They shouldn’t get a penny of a performanc­erelated bonus, by definition. You can’t reward failure on this scale with millions of pounds, it’s ridiculous.’ Lesley Mance, 29, from Reading, said: ‘I am furious they were paid so much when they were completely incapable of keeping the company afloat or avoiding this mayhem.’

The assistant accountant was threatened with eviction from her hotel in Tenerife if she did not pay almost £1,000 in additional fees owed by Thomas Cook. She said: ‘If executives had any decency they would return the money to the people who are suffering because of their incompeten­ce.’

Thomas Cook cabin crew member Elizabeth Telford, 56, from Newcastle, accused Mr Fankhauser of being blind to changes in a travel industry confronted with more choice in the internet age.

It emerged last night that Thomas Cook had been forced to introduce rules to curb bonuses in 2012. Under the Insolvency Act 1986, the official receiver has the power to claw back payments made to directors if the payment has been to the detriment of creditors.

It means Thomas Cook directors could potentiall­y face having to pay back part of their rewards.

Spanish and Turkish government officials had tabled offers of financial support to save the firm during rescue talks last week. They acted because the company was key to their tourism industries. However the UK Government ruled out getting involved in a bailout as ‘not a good use of taxpayers’ money’.

WHILE the collapse of Thomas Cook was, for many customers, an enraging and costly inconvenie­nce, for others it was a heartbreak­ing tragedy.

Take terminally-ill Matt Dominic, 43. He and his wife were looking forward to a final holiday in Tenerife.

or Connor Kitching, seven. His trip to Disney in Florida with his family was meant to be a well- earned treat for his bravery after beating cancer.

The fallout from the demise of the world’s oldest travel agent is truly shocking.

A staggering 156,000 Britons stranded abroad – prompting the biggest peacetime mission to fly them home. one million holidays ruined, 9,000 devastated staff unemployed and 600 shops shut for good.

Predictabl­y, Labour blamed ministers for not propping up the stricken tour operator.

But was it really the state’s responsibi­lity to throw the company a taxpayer-funded lifeline? It wasn’t vital to the economy or security. So the harsh reality is ‘no’.

In truth, dark clouds were gathering on Thomas Cook’s horizon for a decade.

Debt-laden, it struggled to adapt to the cut-throat world of modern travel – where tourists book cheap online flights themselves and rent rooms on Airbnb.

Let’s not mince our words: The firm was managed with spectacula­r incompeten­ce.

In any sane world those who presided over such a fiasco would either resign or be marched unceremoni­ously out of the office.

not here. With contemptuo­us disregard for their customers, bosses loaded their satchels with £47million in salary and bonuses.

Pointedly, Boris Johnson questioned why they were paid so handsomely as the business went ‘down the tubes’.

no wonder the Business Secretary has ordered an investigat­ion into the shambles. It must be speedy, meticulous and acted upon – not punted into the long grass.

no one seriously argues against rewards for success. But it plays into Jeremy Corbyn’s anti- capitalist agenda when a perverse corporate culture rewards failure.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom