Courageous Boris

If A PM ( Blair) can send our country’s Armed forces to war based on a fiction which resulted in the deaths of a large number of troops and civilians, why doesn’t he have to go before the Supreme Court?

If a PM (Major) can prorogue Parliament over a Cash for Questions inquiry, why does he not have to be adjudged by the Supreme Court?

If a Chancellor (Brown), later to become a PM, sells some of our gold reserves when its price is at its lowest, why is he not adjudged by the Supreme Court on whether his actions were lawful?

If a serving MP (Corbyn) has associated with known terrorist groups that have murdered and maimed members of hM forces and innocent British civilians, why has that person not appeared before the Supreme Court to answer for his actions?

Why are MPs who gained their positions on promises of giving us Brexit and yet are doing nothing but blocking it or in some cases trying to turn it around not appearing before the Supreme Court?

If the Speaker in Parliament fails in his duties in being impartial, why is he not likewise answerable to the Supreme Court?

Yet a PM who legally prorogues Parliament is answerable to the Supreme Court on allegations based on hearsay and supposition.

have I got faith in the judicial system and the recent ruling of the Supreme Court — most certainly not. have I got faith in a PM that is trying his best to rid this country of the shackles of the eu dictatorship — most certainly have. for the first time since Maggie Thatcher we have a Prime Minister with ‘b***s’.

God help us all if the alternatives get in power.

WILLIAM BooTH, Spalding, Lincs.