Sussex Royal brand will stay ... for now

But Palace deal means Harry and Meghan agree NOT to use HRH titles

HARRY and Meghan will continue to operate their trademarked Sussex Royal brand despite agreeing not to use their royal titles.

As part of their independence deal agreed by the Queen, they will keep their HRH titles but will not use them once they cease to be working royals.

They will not be addressed as His or Her Royal Highness, but will be Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

Their decision to step back from royal duties had led to speculation they could be stripped of their HRH titles, and may no longer be able to use Sussex Royal.

But a source said such a move was considered too extreme, and could have been problematic for the Royal Family in the future.

The insider added that a final decision on Sussex Royal will be made after further negotiations, but the brand would refer to the couple’s soon-to-be announced charitable foundation and not commercial activities.

The source said: ‘ There are still a lot of details to be worked out, but if it’s the use of the word “royal” in a charitable sense, then what is the problem?’

Had Harry and Meghan been stripped of their titles completely, they would have been considered junior to other members of the family, such as Prince Andrew’s daughters Beatrice and Eugenie.

That could have led to the embarrassing prospect of Meghan having to curtsey to the princesses.

The HRH title was taken from Harry’s mother Diana and his aunt Sarah Ferguson after they divorced, but he was born a royal, so the Queen would have had to issue a Letters Patent to remove it.

Applications have already been made to trademark the Sussex Royal brand, which is at the centre of the couple’s social media presence, including their website and Twitter and Instagram accounts. They will be free to make commercial deals without the involvement of Buckingham Palace, but aides have insisted such arrangements will be ‘respectful’ of the Queen.

They have not yet signed any contracts and have agreed not to become brand ambassadors for any big companies. Instead, they are expected to seek commercial deals that complement causes close to their charitable interests. Harry has signed up as co-creator and executive producer on an Apple TV documentary on mental health with US broadcaster Oprah Winfrey, due to be screened this year. He is understood to have asked for his fee to be donated to mental health organisations.

Meghan has also agreed to provide a voiceover for a Disney film in exchange for a donation to a conservation charity.

In future, they could be paid for such agreements, although they will inevitably face accusations that they are cashing in on Harry’s royal background. Meghan’s father Thomas Markle has already voiced concerns that they will ‘cheapen’ the Royal Family.

In a documentary for Channel 5, Mr Markle will say his daughter had lived every girl’s princess dream when she married Harry.

But he added: ‘Now... it looks like she’s tossing that away for money.

‘Apparently $3million and a 26bedroom home isn’t enough for them. It’s kind of embarrassing to me. This is like one of the greatest long-living institutions ever. They are destroying it... cheapening it, making it shabby... turning it into a Walmart with a crown on it.’

Harry and Meghan need an income to replace the estimated £2million a year from the taxpayerfunded Sovereign Grant, which supports the most senior royals.

Prince Charles is expected to support Harry financially for at least a year. Harry also has his own wealth, including an estimated £20million inheritance from Princess Diana and £7million from the Queen Mother. Meghan is thought to be worth £4million.