Daily Mail

Average HS2 worker costs taxpayer £94,824 a year

Spiralling costs of troubled high-speed rail link ramped up by ‘ridiculous’ wages

- By Daniel Martin Policy Editor

EACH person working on the HS2 rail project costs the taxpayer almost £100,000 on average, it has emerged.

And the chief executive of the troubled high- speed link leads the charge – taking home more than four times the Prime Minister last year with £659,416.

The astonishin­g figures were revealed in HS2’s annual report, which also detailed millions spent on communicat­ions, dinners, transport and hotel costs.

They will raise fresh questions over the huge costs of the project, which have already spiralled out of control from £36billion in 2012 to an estimated £106billion.

The 2019/20 report revealed that HS2 Ltd employs 1,415 people at a cost of £134.2million.

Most of this is made up of wages and salaries, as well as employer pension and National Insurance contributi­ons – all of which are funded by the taxpayer. It means each staff member cost £94,824 on average in 2019/20, up from £92,501 the year before. Of that amount, an average of £80,189 went directly to the employee in wages.

It was already known that chief executive Mark Thurston is the most highly-paid public worker in the country.

But the report disclosed that he took home a £617,296 basic salary last year, up from £603,350 the year before.

On top of this he received a bonus payment of £36,743 as well as ‘taxable benefits’ of £5,376 – a total of £659,416.

The next highest paid was Michael Bradley, HS2’s chief financial officer. His salary of £ 274,500 was boosted by bonuses, taxable benefits and pension benefit to take his final package to £355,044.

Allan Cook, the chairman, took £266,770 in total. In comparison, Boris Johnson earns just over £150,000 a year.

Campaigner­s last night accused HS2 of ‘taking taxpayers for a ride’.

Harry Fone of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘Since day one HS2 has over-promised and under-delivered.

‘It’s no wonder many see this project as a white elephant that rewards poor performanc­e.

Proper scrutiny is long overdue, the Government must interrogat­e costs and get a grip on this runaway gravy train.’

Former Tory Cabinet minister Cheryl Gillan, who has been campaignin­g against the highspeed link which cuts through her Buckingham­shire constituen­cy, said: ‘This is a project which is out of control. We knew it is costing the taxpayer an arm and a leg, and now we learn about these ridiculous salary costs.

‘They are building a railway which is going to be old by the time it is completed.

‘Taxpayers’ money would be better spent levelling up between the north and south through high-speed broadband and better east-west connection­s in the north. That would provide employment, but not at this exorbitant cost.’

The annual report into HS2 – which will link London to Leeds and Manchester via Birmingham – shows that in 2019/20 the wage bill was £113.5million, or just over £80million per member of staff on average.

On top of this, they benefit from £ 7,098 in employers’ pension contributi­ons each on average.

The report also reveals the huge amount spent by HS2 Ltd in ‘non-staff expenditur­e’ such as dinners, hotel stays and travel costs.

More than £3.3million was spent on ‘travel and subsistenc­e’ and £802,000 on recruitmen­t fees. Accommodat­ion costs were £13.8million – up from £8.9million the year before.

Some £24.8million was spent on communicat­ion and informatio­n technology.

Last night an HS2 Ltd spokesman said: ‘In a highly technical project of the scale and complexity of HS2 it is necessary to employ the right level of expertise and knowledge to successful­ly deliver the programme safely and on time.

‘HS2 Ltd is committed to controllin­g costs and take our responsibi­lity to ensure taxpayers get value for money very seriously.’

‘Runaway gravy train’

 ??  ?? North-south link: Artist’s impression of an HS2 train
North-south link: Artist’s impression of an HS2 train
 ??  ?? Top earner: Mark Thurston
Top earner: Mark Thurston

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom