Daily Mail

G4S blasts Garda over pension claims

- By Tom Witherow

SeCURITY firm G4S fought back against GardaWorld yesterday, blasting ‘misleading’ pension claims.

Garda, which has mounted a hostile bid for G4S, began talks with shareholde­rs on Monday, arguing they should be ‘seriously concerned’ by the pension deficit and ‘mistakes’ that have driven the share price down.

Yesterday, G4S hit back saying the scheme, which has 24,000 members, 14,500 of whom are already drawing their pensions, was well-funded and that the trustees are happy with their plan to pay down the £276m deficit.

Canadian company Garda has pointed to the scheme’s £2.7bn obligation­s, but G4S highlighte­d that the fund also has £2.4bn of assets.

Chief executive Ashley Almanza, who has run the company since 2013, said Garda had failed to publicly state an alternativ­e plan. he said: ‘It affects former employees who have served us for many years and we want them to be treated fairly.’

G4S, which is vigorously fighting the bid, said Garda had made £524m of losses in the last three years, and is not big enough to be a truly global player. The 190p-per- share bid offer, worth just under £3bn, ‘significan­tly undervalue­s’ it and its prospects, and Garda’s offer is ‘opportunis­tic and clearly inadequate’, it said.

Almanza also took issue with Garda World’s claim that G4S faces ‘potentiall­y crippling unresolved lawsuits’. ‘The statements are misleading,’ he said. ‘There’s no doubt in my mind these statements are designed to serve their interests rather than the interests of shareholde­rs. Why would they want to buy a bad company?’

The G4S pension trustees confirmed they were in dialogue with Garda to understand its proposals.

Almanza inherited a litany of problems. G4S has been at the heart of several controvers­ies. In July it paid £44m to settle allegation­s it charged the Government to monitor dead offenders in contracts dating back to 2005. The current leaders says its woes are historic and a £300m prison contract, announced this week, showed that it has regained trust with the Government.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom