Daily Mail

FINANCIAL HAMMER BLOW FOR HORSERACIN­G

- By MATT HUGHES Chief Sports Reporter

RACING suffered another significan­t financial setback yesterday with the Government rejecting the industry’s request to launch a formal review of the gambling levy this year. In a letter to Annamarie Phelps, the chair of the British Horseracin­g Associatio­n, sports minister Nigel Huddleston made clear that increasing the rate of the levy above the 10 per cent of profits which bookmakers are obliged to pay to racing will not form part of the Government’s current review of the 2005 Gambling Act. The reluctance to look again at bookmakers’ payments to racing is a major blow to a sport that projected losses of more than £300million due to Covid-19 before the pandemic’s second wave, which due to the prolonged absence of crowds has since exacerbate­d their financial suffering. The demand for an early review of the levy, which was not due to be

considered until 2024, was a key part of racing’s Covid- 19 recovery plan published last August.

The BHA and racecourse­s are calling for gambling operators to pay a levy on turnover rather than profits, and also want a cut of bets that are placed on overseas races.

The Government have considered these requests but concluded there was no case for a review, with Huddleston seeking to clarify their position in a letter to the BHA sent yesterday.

The timing of the next review could still be brought forward from 2024 but Huddleston’s letter suggests the Government are reluctant to do so.

‘I am aware that some stakeholde­rs have reported that, during the statement, I made a commitment to review the rate of the levy itself in 2021,’ Huddleston wrote to Phelps (below).

‘To clarify, we intend at some point this year to look again at whether there is a case for bringing forward the timetable for the review of the levy due in 2024. We did not feel there was such a case on the basis of the evidence you put forward last year. I know you have regular discussion­s with my officials and any new evidence which you are able to provide will be relevant for any reconsider­ation of your previous request for an early review.’ In an earlier letter from Huddleston to Phelps, sent last October, the Government outlined their reasons for opposing levy reform, arguing that with a yield of £97m in 2019-20, the betting pool was generating far more income for racing than had been forecast. Huddleston wrote: ‘We have considered your requests carefully, but the evidence suggests that the 2017 reforms do not need to be revisited at this point.’

The BHA insisted it was not a fresh setback on the grounds the Government would still consider altering the timetable for the next levy review. ‘In December DCMS announced their intention that in 2021 they would re- examine the timescales for reviewing the Horserace Betting Levy, which is currently not due for review until 2024,’ the BHA said in a statement.

‘This has been reiterated to the BHA in a letter received yesterday. We welcome this commitment.’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom