Daily Mail

RACING PREACHES ABOUT ANIMAL WELFARE BUT IT’S HARD NOT TO BE SCEPTICAL NOW

- MARTIN SAMUEL

GORdON EllIOTT, trainer of three Grand National winners including Tiger Roll, has given his explanatio­n for the photograph that appeared of him sitting on a dead horse. And what an explanatio­n it is. A cynic might even argue he is flogging a — well, you know. ‘The photo in question was taken some time ago and occurred after a horse had died of an apparent heart attack on the gallops,’ said Elliott. ‘At what was a sad time, my initial reaction was to get the body removed from where it was positioned. ‘I was standing over the horse waiting to help with the removal of the body, in the course of which, to my memory, I received a call and, without thinking, I sat down to take it…’ Sat down on a dead horse, that is. Just to clarify the key fact missing from that sentence. ‘I sat down (on a dead horse) to take it. . .’ Pray continue ‘. . . hearing a shout from one of my team, I gestured to wait until I was finished.’ Ah, so that would be the apparent V for victory sign Elliott is making in the image. He’s signalling two minutes. As in, ‘Give me two minutes to sit on this dead horse and finish this call and then I’ll get up from sitting on this dead horse and be right with you.’ Actually, Elliott is not so much sitting on the unfortunat­e animal as astride it. Not a natural resting position, astride. Many people sit down to take a telephone call, very few sit astride on hearing the ringtone. Pavlov’s Jockeys, maybe. In the park, folk are often found sitting on benches. Not astride benches, mind, even though they can. They sit facing forward. That’s the human sitting position. Cocking one leg over, certainly across an expanse as big as a dead horse, takes calculatio­n, effort and is uncomforta­ble. Even horsey folk don’t tend to sit astride, on anything but horses — although not, we hope, on dead ones. The Irish Horseracin­g Regulatory Board are now investigat­ing Elliott under the catch-all remit of bringing the sport into disrepute. There are no specific rules against using dead horses as incidental furniture, probably because it never occurred that an individual — certainly one engaged in an industry that purports to love horses — would display such an

absence of decency and respect. Yet disrepute punishment­s range from fines to bans and licence suspension. The British Horseracin­g Authority acted last night to ban Elliott from its racecourse­s in the meantime, and issued a statement saying it was ‘appalled’. Inside the sport, some are making the distinctio­n between the treatment and status of horses in different parts of the world. The gilded existence of the animals at some stables is not always replicated. In Ireland, it is argued, racing is steeped in farming traditions, with attendant attitudes towards life and death. Farm animals die without the grief afforded pets. If racehorses are an extension of farm animals, attitudes will be hardened. Yet racing is not simply a country pursuit. It has a national following and an emotional connection. Popular horses — Red Rum, desert Orchid — are afforded human characteri­stics. Their deaths are mourned. Sentiment aside, it is important all horses are treated with kindness and an appreciati­on of their selfless qualities. Many will find the photograph of Elliott hugely offensive. Betfair have already dropped him as an ambassador. And, no doubt, with the Cheltenham Festival and the Grand National meeting coming up, we will hear much about animal welfare, perhaps in the face of fatalities. And we will be told, as always, that nobody cares for horses more than those involved in racing. Given, however, that Arab owners still support and participat­e in savage endurance contests in the Middle East and a much-respected Grand National trainer thinks nothing of parking it for five minutes on a lifeless equine carcass, is it any wonder these mitigation­s are met with increasing scepticism? If Elliott is at Cheltenham this year he is fortunate — and luckier still that no spectators will be present. It is unlikely such a lame explanatio­n would be taken sitting down.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom