Daily Mail

Post Office ‘told staff to shred documents’

- By Tom Witherow Business Correspond­ent PAUL THOMAS IS AWAY

pOST Office staff shredded key documents that could have helped postmaster­s defend themselves against prosecutio­ns, a court has heard.

Between 1999 and 2015, hundreds of postmaster­s were sacked or prosecuted after money appeared to go missing from their branches.

The post Office was told glitches in its Horizon computer system may have been to blame but pursued prosecutio­ns anyway.

now evidence has emerged that post Office staff were ordered to destroy documents in 2013 to protect the company’s reputation.

It came as the Court of Appeal began hearing the cases of 42 former subpostmas­ters whose conviction­s were referred to it by the Criminal Cases review Commission last year after a landmark civil action against the post Office.

The firm was told the destructio­n of documents could constitute a ‘conspiracy to pervert the course of justice’.

Sam Stein QC, representi­ng five of the postmaster­s, told the court yesterday: ‘The post

Office’s reaction is one of dishonesty and destructio­n and shredding of documents. you cannot see this any other way.’

The prosecutio­ns led to the break-up of marriages, bankruptcy and for ‘some to take their own lives’ and ‘the post Office has now turned itself into the nation’s most untrustwor­thy brand’, mr Stein said.

All but four of the appeals are unopposed, meaning at least 38 will have their conviction­s overturned when the judgment is passed down on April 23.

The order to shred documents came after the post Office followed legal advice to make a central database of errors and bugs in its IT system.

Bosses set up weekly meetings to discuss progress. But after it became clear how much material had been obtained, an order was made to destroy evidence of the meetings, the court heard.

The post Office’s legal adviser wrote: ‘An instructio­n was issued that those emails and minutes should be destroyed.

The word shredded was conveyed to me.’

He added: ‘It was said that handwritte­n minutes should not be typed and should be forwarded to the post Office’s head of security. They said if it’s not minuted, it’s not in the public domain and therefore not disclosabl­e [in court].’

The post Office has already paid a £58million settlement to 557 postmaster­s after an acrimoniou­s High Court battle and faces a further 2,400 claims.

The post Office said: ‘We sincerely apologise for historical failings and have taken determined action to address the past.’ The case continues.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom