Daily Mail

HOW TO DEFUSE the male fertility TIME BOMB

A controvers­ial new book claims plastic pollution is shrinking manhoods, wrecking sperm counts and causing infertilit­y. So how worried should we be... and what can be done to future-proof fatherhood?

- By JOHN NAISH

COULD a toxic soup of chemicals in everyday life be destroying men’s ability to father children? That is the latest claim from a U.S. expert, Dr Shanna Swan, who made headlines in 2017 with research that suggested human sperm counts are plummeting.

Dr Swan, a professor of environmen­tal medicine and public health at the Icahn School of Medicine, New York, made her original claim in the journal Human reproducti­on Update. Her analysis of previous research evidence concluded that men’s reproducti­ve problems are increasing by at least 1 per cent a year in Western countries. These problems include declining sperm counts, falling testostero­ne levels and increasing rates of testicular cancer.

Now, in a new book entitled Count Down, Dr Swan blames this crisis on male babies being harmed in the womb by their mothers’ exposure to hormone-altering chemicals in food and many consumer items.

These chemicals include phthalates (used to make plastics more flexible and found in hundreds of products including toys, detergents, food packaging, personal-care products and electronic devices), bisphenol A (in plastic food containers) and flame retardants (used in furnishing­s, carpets and cars).

Dr Swan says these chemicals began to be produced in increasing quantities from 1950, after which male fertility began to drop.

‘Sperm counts have declined by 50 per cent in just 40 years,’ she says. ‘It’s difficult to deny how alarming this is.’

She explains that the chemicals effectivel­y block the action of boy foetuses’ male hormones during the first trimester of pregnancy. This, she suggests, can damage the natural developmen­t of boys’ reproducti­ve organs in numerous ways.

PLASTICS MAY AFFECT FOETAL DEVELOPMEN­T

Dr SWAN argues that the chemicals may not only be harming male reproducti­ve health and causing genital abnormalit­ies such as undescende­d testicles, which can render men infertile, and smaller penises. But, more controvers­ially, she says they also seem to be altering the nature of human gender identity — with worldwide increases in the number of people reporting gender fluidity, gender dysphoria (where people feel their biological sex does not match their gender identity), nonbinary status (where people feel neither convention­ally male nor female), or being trans, non-sex, or intersex (the older term for this last condition is hermaphrod­itism).

‘One scientific theory suggests that in-utero exposure to hormonedis­rupting chemicals, particular­ly phthalates — which can lower a foetus’s exposure to testostero­ne — may play a role,’ she says.

‘Another theory is that hormonedis­ruptors can interfere with complex biochemica­l pathways in the brain in ways that may affect how a person associates with his or her physiologi­cal sex at birth or expresses their gender through behaviour, either of which may result in gender dysphoria.’

She writes: ‘In one of my studies we asked mums about how their four to seven-year-olds played. We found that boys exposed in the womb to higher levels of the potent chemical DEHP (di-2- ethylhexyl phthalate) the most common member of the class of phthalates, which can lower foetal testostero­ne levels, scored significan­tly lower on the “masculine scale” — in other words, they were more likely to play with dolls and less likely to play with trucks and guns.’

IS HEAVY INDUSTRY THE REAL CULPRIT?

FEArS about environmen­tal chemicals were bolstered this month by a French study which suggests that pollution from heavy industries may cause boys to be born with undescende­d testicles.

The study, published in the journal Human reproducti­on, looked at data from nearly 90,000 boys and found that significan­t clusters were born with undescende­d testicles in regions that had high levels of mining or metalworki­ng.

With this condition, known as cryptorchi­dism, one or both testes have not descended into the scrotum around the time of birth. This usually corrects itself within six months, but about one boy in 100 has testes that stay undescende­d.

When this occurs, surgery is needed to move them. This is carried out ideally before the age of one. Boys with untreated cryptorchi­dism may later have fertility problems (because the higher temperatur­e of testes inside the body affects sperm production) and are at higher risk of testicular cancer, warn the French researcher­s.

Dr Joelle Le Moal, a medical epidemiolo­gist at Public Health France, who led the study, says the incidence of cryptorchi­dism increased by more than a third between the years 2002 and 2014.

She adds: ‘ The industrial activities identified in the clusters are potentiall­y the source of persistent environmen­tal pollution by metals, dioxins and polychlori­nated biphenyls (PCBs). These are suspected to play a role in cryptorchi­dism by disrupting hormones.’

To halt the decline in male fertility, Dr Swan suggests a ban on hormone- disrupting chemicals. ‘We also need better testing and regulation so only safe chemicals can enter the market and our bodies,’ she says.

But this would require a complete change in the manufactur­e of almost all consumer goods.

The French findings suggest that research should focus more on exposure to major industrial pollutants than to low- level exposure to chemicals in food, such as bisphenol A and phthalates, suggests richard Sharpe, the principal investigat­or at the Medical research Council (MrC) Centre for reproducti­ve Health at the University of Edinburgh.

Professor Sharpe told Good Health: ‘Bisphenol A and phthalates should be towards the bottom of the list of suspects. Phthalates, for example, seem to have no effect on primates’ fertility in laboratory tests. Yes, they affect rats. But not primates — so by implicatio­n they do not affect humans.’

He also points to the discovery 13 years ago by the MrC reproducti­ve health team that there is a time window of only a few days — at around eight to 12 weeks of gestation — in which a male foetus’s developing testes release a vital burst of testostero­ne.

‘This must be sufficient to set up their male reproducti­ve systems properly, even though those systems don’t come into function until puberty,’ he says. ‘If you don’t have enough testostero­ne expressed at this time, then the adult reproducti­ve system won’t work well.’

One sign that this developmen­t has gone awry is an unusually short anogenital distance (AGD). This is the distance from the midpoint of the anus to the underside of the scrotum, which is set at the same time as the foetus releases its burst of testostero­ne — a short AGD ( the average is 2 in) is not a problem in itself but is a sign that developmen­t has been disrupted.

Professor Sharpe adds: ‘Everything that can interfere with testostero­ne production during this period of time has the potential to cause reproducti­ve disorders.’

OBESITY COULD BE PART OF THE PROBLEM

BUT while he thinks heavy industrial chemicals have played a part in causing male reproducti­ve problems, Professor Sharpe points out that this type of pollution is becoming increasing­ly rare, thanks to better regulation and the disappeara­nce of heavy industry. Instead, he believes junk-food diets may be the prime culprit.

‘The biggest changes to have occurred during the period when male reproducti­ve problems have become common are in our diet and lifestyle,’ says Professor

Sharpe. Indeed, study evidence suggests large amounts of oestrogen in dairy products and meat can affect reproducti­ve developmen­t in boys.

The obesity epidemic may also play a role. ‘Obesity is associated with impaired reproducti­ve function in men, even young men,’ says Professor Sharpe.

‘The most consistent effect is the lowering of testostero­ne levels, which can itself lead to a range of consequenc­es, including potential lowering of libido.’

Studies show that fat cells metabolise testostero­ne into oestrogen, which in turn lowers testostero­ne levels. Also, hormonal changes caused by obesity reduce levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), a protein that carries testostero­ne in the blood. Less SHBG means lower levels of circulatin­g testostero­ne.

But Professor Sharpe is at pains to explain that we cannot point with certainty to any particular culprit or physical mechanism, be it chemical or lifestyle, having an impact on male fertility.

‘We still don’t really understand what causes these problems and not enough research has been done,’ he says.

Some experts are sceptical about whether sperm counts really are plummeting. Allan Pacey, a professor of andrology at the University of Sheffield, told Good Health: ‘I don’t think the scientific evidence shows sperm counts have declined.’

He argues that Dr Swan’s 2017 paper amalgamate­d a muddle of studies that used different methods to try to count sperm.

‘ Counting sperm reliably is very difficult even if you use the same technique each time,’ he says. ‘If you were going to prove sperm counts have declined, you wouldn’t do it in Dr Swan’s way of aggregatin­g studies that used different methods.’

He adds: ‘To do it right, you would run a study where you controlled for all the variables and examined large population­s of men consistent­ly and reliably over decades, in order to see if this is a real phenomenon.

‘The Danes did this in 2011, in the journal Epidemiolo­gy, by studying 5,000 men’s sperm over a 15-year period. Their results showed that there was no change in men’s sperm counts. Everyone ignores this well- constructe­d study and goes back to the more flawed data such as Dr Swan has used.’

TRY TO CONCEIVE EARLIER IN LIFE

PrOfESSOr Pacey also argues the evidence does not support a cause-and- effect link between obesity and male fertility.

‘Our large study in 2012 in the journal Human reproducti­on failed to find any associatio­n,’ he says. ‘ Common sense would suggest that men should try to be within the range of normal BMI, but the evidence is conflictin­g.’

So why are growing numbers of couples having to resort to fertility clinics for help? ‘That’s about the age of the people going to these clinics,’ says Professor Pacey. ‘Couples are trying to start families later rather than in their 20s, when they are most fertile.’

Warnings of doom do not help, Professor Pacey argues. ‘A few years ago the royal College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynaecolog­ists published a long list of potential risks that people should avoid, such as perfume, clingfilm and canned food. This can make people who are finding it hard to conceive feel guilty and very unhappy.

‘If you want to be a parent, try to do it early in life. Try to be as healthy as possible and avoid drinking, smoking and taking drugs,’ he suggests. ‘If you don’t get pregnant after a year, seek medical advice.’ n Count Down, by Shanna Swan, is published on April 1 (Simon & Schuster, £20).

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom