Daily Mail

Pen’s animal mission DID put soldiers at risk

- By Daniel Martin Policy Editor

BRITISH soldiers were put at risk by the decision to evacuate animals from Afghanista­n, the whistleblo­wer claims.

Pen Farthing, a former Royal Marine, persuaded the Government to help him evacuate 1 0 dogs and cats from Kabul. The animals had been looked after by his charity Nowzad.

But Raphael Marshall told MPs he agreed with the military that it was wrong that Mr Farthing’s charity was given priority when translator­s were being left to their fate.

In his statement, the former Foreign Office civil servant says: ‘There was no reason to believe the Taliban would target animal rights charities. There was therefore no justificat­ion for concluding Nowzad’s staff were at significan­t risk.

‘By contrast many others would inevitably be left behind who were at risk of murder. Similarly the protection of domestic animals was not a UK war aim in Afghanista­n.’

Mr Marshall adds: ‘There was a direct trade-off between transporti­ng Nowzad’s animals and evacuating British nationals and Afghan evacuees, including Afghans who had served with British soldiers. This is because soldiers tasked with escorting the dogs through the crowd and into the airport would have otherwise been deployed to support the evacuation of British nationals or Afghans prioritise­d for evacuation.

‘The limited number of British soldiers available to help UK visa holders and British citizens from the crowd into the airport was an important limiting factor on our ability to evacuate people.’

He says: ‘I wish the staff of Nowzad all the best in their new life in the UK but they were not eligible for evacuation, let alone for exceptiona­l assistance which prioritise­d them above British Army interprete­rs. I believe British soldiers were put at risk in order to bring Nowzad’s animals into the airport.’

Mr Marshall goes on to say an American animal charity is still operating in Kabul and has not been subject to any mistreatme­nt by the Taliban.

‘This vindicates the MoD and FCDO’s belief that neither Nowzad’s animals nor its staff were at risk from the Taliban,’ he writes. ‘Her Majesty’s Government transporte­d animals which were not at risk of harm at the direct expense of evacuating British nationals and people at risk of imminent murder, including interprete­rs.’

 ?? ?? Controvers­y: Pen Farthing in Afghanista­n with two of the dogs his charity cared for
Controvers­y: Pen Farthing in Afghanista­n with two of the dogs his charity cared for
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom