You can hardly blame Boehly for giving the boot to the old Chelsea board

IT USED to be said that the easiest job in football was being a director at Arsenal. ‘Just do what the French lad wants. Meeting adjourned.’

Later, when Arsene Wenger’s judgments became less reliable, we were able to see how smart Arsenal’s board members were.

And then that mantle passed to Chelsea. Imagine being front of house for Roman Abramovich. Whatever you did, right or wrong, he picked up the bill. Fall out with a manager, and Abramovich paid him off and financed the next one. A costly transfer misstep? Abramovich authorised plan B.

So, as he prepares to enter the bidding for Raheem Sterling in his interim role as sporting director, Todd Boehly must wonder what all the fuss is about.

This is where the really hard work begins, with Chelsea now owned by a man who wishes to run a business. He may be a little mystified at the horror greeting news of the departures of Bruce Buck and Marina Granovskaia last week. Petr Cech is the latest to go, standing down from his role as technical and performance adviser yesterday.

Yet, Boehly might ask, what has happened at Chelsea recently that suggests loss? Buck, the chairman, was a shrewd political player during Richard Scudamore’s time at the Premier League, but was left critically damaged by the Super League breakaway and the reputational cost of Abramovich’s links to Vladimir Putin’s regime.

The request to play the Middlesbrough FA Cup tie behind closed doors was disastrous, and a recent attempt to break the ice at a Premier League meeting with a joke about Chelsea’s predicament fell painfully flat. One of those present described it as a mortifying experience for the personable Buck to be met with stone- faced silence from his contemporaries, his influence now departed.

As for Granovskaia — Abramovich’s most trusted executive and regularly depicted as the master negotiator — explain that one to Boehly given that he just signed off a paltry £8million loan fee from Inter Milan, for a player the Italians sold to Chelsea for £97.5m last summer.

Boehly has also waved goodbye to his best defender, Antonio Rudiger, on a free to Real Madrid, and may soon be taking significant hits on Kepa Arrizabalaga, Hakim Ziyech and Timo Werner, also expensively recruited.

And Chelsea have not won the league since significantly alienating Antonio Conte over the sale of Diego Costa in 2017. For such a smart operator, Granovskaia does seem to have presided over some significant errors.

And while Cech gets the credit for finding Edouard Mendy, what else has he advised on? If Chelsea have remained consistently successful, it is because Abramovich has bankrolled all ventures, astute or not. If a coach falls short, it does help to be able to get Conte or Maurizio Sarri or Thomas Tuchel to make it right. Boehly might not wish to finance a revolving door policy.

Also, why the surprise that he wishes to run his own show? Why would he pay £4.25billion for Chelsea and leave the previous incumbents in place? Not least as what was required was a clean break from the Abramovich regime and Buck and Granovskaia — even Cech — represented anything but. Chelsea are now among the clubs interested in Michael Edwards, the man responsible for the assembly of Jurgen Klopp’s Liverpool. Now, that’s an operator. That would be a signing.