Daily Mail

I had a secret abortion 60 years ago

The top food writer makes a shock confession — for the sake of her American granddaugh­ters whose right to choose is in peril

- by ELISABETH LUARD

YESTERDAY, I logged on to my online writing group, where we meet virtually to encourage each other to get some work done. Before we start, we share the task we’ve chosen to focus on that day. Unthinking, I tapped out: ‘Writing an article about my abortion.’ then I stopped and quickly deleted the last three words before posting.

But why? How did I expect my fellow writers, mostly female, to respond? With a lack of understand­ing, compassion, outright disapprova­l? Did I fear that they would judge me, think ill of me? Well, quite frankly, yes.

And it’s this, the fear of social and emotional censure, that has silenced me for nearly 60 years. Until now, I had not told a soul about how I ended a pregnancy as a 21-year-old married mother of one.

Six decades may have passed, but abortion remains taboo. We can talk about menopause, menstruati­on, miscarriag­e — even breastfeed in the Commons — but we can’t talk freely about the a-word. (I still hesitate to use the word — preferring terminatio­n as it’s less likely to attract fury or blame.)

But at the age of 80, I’ve had a change of heart. the reason? the shocking news that the U.S. Supreme Court last week overturned Roe v Wade, allowing states to ban or restrict women’s access to abortions. As a result, it will be difficult or impossible for women across the U.S. to access safe terminatio­ns.

Now I realise how important it is for women like me to spill the beans. After all, one in three women in the UK will have had an abortion by the age of 45. But our collective silence means it may come as a surprise that there are so many of us out there.

I completely understand that it’s a personal matter, but now is the time for those of us who exercised the right to choose to speak up. If not now, when?

this is not just an issue affecting single teenagers, who could be dismissed as knowing no better, but grown women in stable relationsh­ips, and it’s important that others know this. According to the latest statistics from 2020, married women account for nearly a fifth of all recorded abortions in the UK.

Another reason what’s happened in the U.S. touches me personally is that I have two university-age granddaugh­ters, born and bred in New York. Not so long ago, we discussed the possibilit­y that Roe v Wade was under threat. I told them my own story; and when neither expressed shock or horror that their granny should write about such a thing, I knew that when the time was right, I would.

BUT when I consulted a friend ( American, freethinki­ng, experience­d) on the wisdom of — how to put it? — ‘ coming out’, she worried about online trolling and warned: ‘Don’t do it! It’s not safe.’

Not safe to admit to ending a pregnancy six decades ago on the advice of two doctors? that did it for me — it was imperative for me to speak up right now.

the pregnancy that led to a terminatio­n was really my own fault.

We were married in February 1963 and our first baby was born in October the same year. At 21, with no proper experience of family life — father lost in the war, mother married again — I had full responsibi­lity for a scrap of life of my own making.

Fortunatel­y, I took to motherhood like a duck to water. Which was just as well since my husband Nicholas’s routine, as a nightclub owner and proprietor of Private Eye, continued uninterrup­ted.

I didn’t tell Nicholas that I hadn’t been taking the contracept­ive pills the doctor prescribed — I’d assumed I was ‘safe’, since agreed wisdom at the time was that you couldn’t get pregnant when you were breastfeed­ing, which I did for nine months.

So when, at my regular sixmonth check- up, the doctor announced another baby was on the way, my reaction was total shock. Another baby when I’d barely recovered from the first. I burst into tears — pregnancy does that to you, anyway. ‘I can’t,’ I said. ‘It’s not possible.’

Doctors generally advise at least 18 months between babies, giving the body time to recover. Some research suggests getting pregnant again within a year increases the risk of premature birth.

But there was another reason for my distress. At my checkup had come the news that my blood group was Rhesus negative, with already developed antibodies. this meant my blood group and my husband’s were incompatib­le.

While this doesn’t usually cause a problem in a first pregnancy, in subsequent pregnancie­s it can cause a woman’s body to produce antibodies that attack the developing foetus.

Both my life and my unborn child’s were in danger. terminatio­n of the second pregnancy — after proper consultati­on with a second doctor and a psychiatri­st — could be recommende­d on those grounds alone. I could have chosen to continue with the pregnancy, but back then we didn’t have the medical treatment (these days a simple course of injections) to prevent the risk to mine or the baby’s life.

I didn’t hesitate. Instinct kicked in. I already had a baby and he was in danger of losing his mother.

Once my husband had signed the paperwork, we’d be on our way. this was, after all, a time when a woman couldn’t open a bank account, raise a mortgage or get a passport in her own right.

Shortly after, I was booked in as a day patient in hospital on the NHS for what was described in the paperwork as a ‘dilatation and curettage’, also known in the gynaecolog­y department, where the process was routine, as a scrape-out.

In 2022, this would be called an abortion. But this was in 1964 — three years before the Abortion Act legalised abortions in certain circumstan­ces — so terminolog­y was important: doctors didn’t use the words ‘abortion’. Yet the truth is plenty of pregnancie­s were brought to an end.

‘ Make yourself comfortabl­e, dear,’ said the nurse as she tucked my feet into the stirrups. ‘If Patient relaxes, it’s easier for Doctor to get it over with quickly. And we all want that, don’t we?’ It took about ten minutes. Afterwards, there was tea and a biscuit and a feeling of intense relief. I had really believed that my beloved baby was in danger of losing his mother. Even so, I knew that what was, for me, a life-saver, wasn’t something to be discussed in public or even in private. Ever. Until now.

As for the effects of what was euphemisti­cally known as ‘ the procedure’ . . . Physically — compared with the painful labour still fresh in my mind from childbirth — no contest. Emotionall­y? An overwhelmi­ng feeling of gratitude that I was again free to care for a baby already born and safely delivered into my arms.

MAYBE I was saved from the enduring sorrow and regret about my abortion that some experience because it was early — about eight weeks. Or maybe it was because I grew to learn from later experience that the loss of full-term babies was terrible in a way that terminatio­n was not.

thanks to our incompatib­le blood groups, Nicholas and I had, in total, four live births out of seven full-term pregnancie­s, each with life-threatenin­g complicati­ons. this was considered a remarkably good result for a family affected by rhesus at the time.

there were mothers-to-be in the waiting room with my kind of problems who lost them all. In those days, no one was offered counsellin­g for infant mortality. No one had a wrapped bundle placed in their arms to grieve.

Perhaps, too, not confessing until now has saved me from the disapprova­l that might have made me question my decision. I was simply deeply grateful that I didn’t need a backstreet abortion, nor had I been obliged to carry a pregnancy to term when my body wasn’t ready.

In the following years, attitudes began to change — in the U.S. too, where in 1973 with Roe v Wade, the Supreme Court effectivel­y legalised abortion. It was unimaginab­le then that almost 50 years later it would be overturned.

What’s doubly shocking is that my life- saving procedure, sanctioned by two doctors, couldn’t now happen in parts of the U.S.

In those states which immediatel­y implemente­d the Supreme Court’s ruling, going ahead could land me in jail, along with my husband and every friend, doctor, nurse or taxi driver who might have facilitate­d this ‘crime’.

I’m proud that my granddaugh­ters are active in the fight for a woman’s right to choose. And the men who march beside them are much more involved in family life than their fathers and grandfathe­rs ever were.

If my granddaugh­ters are brave enough to nail their colours to the mast, then so should I.

 ?? ?? Joy of my life: Elisabeth Luard with her eldest son at three months old
Joy of my life: Elisabeth Luard with her eldest son at three months old

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom