Labour’s civil war on Brexit
As Keir vows party will NOT campaign to rejoin EU, his comrades say UK is better in single market
LABOUR was plunged into civil war over Brexit last night as senior figures rejected Keir Starmer’s vow that the party would not attempt to rejoin the EU.
In a much-hyped speech, Sir Keir claimed Labour had finally accepted the result of the 2016 referendum and would instead seek to ‘make Brexit work’.
Speaking at the Irish Embassy in London, he said he ‘couldn’t disagree more’ with those seeking to reverse Brexit, adding: ‘We cannot afford to look back over our shoulder.’
He pledged that Labour would not rejoin the EU or institutions like the single market or customs union.
But he did suggest that he would water down Brexit by agreeing to align with EU rules in key sectors like agriculture.
And senior figures made clear that a future Labour government would face immediate pressure from within to cosy up to Brussels.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan claimed the UK would be ‘more prosperous... being members of the single market.’
Mr Khan acknowledged that his comments were at odds with Sir Keir’s but said: ‘I believe that our city and our country’s future is best served being members of the single market.’
He added: ‘We can’t go back into the European Union, the British public have spoken, what we can do though is to make sure we have the least worst option. For me that is being members of the single market.’
Stella Creasy, chairman of the Labour Movement for Europe, said Sir Keir’s speech ‘opens the door to a different future with Europe’ – but said he must also keep open the option of restoring much closer ties with Brussels.
‘We are only just beginning to understand the damage Brexit is doing so we urge Keir to make sure nothing is off the table,’ she said.
‘Labour must show it understands our national interest lies in working with, not shouting at, our European counterparts.’
Asked directly whether Labour should keep open the idea of rejoining the single market and customs union and restarting free movement, she said: ‘Yes, it’s right to look at what can be done now but shortsighted to ignore options for the future too.’
Manuel Cortes, general secretary of the TSSA transport union, which is affiliated to Labour, described Brexit as ‘toxic’ and suggested it should be reversed. Mr Cortes said it was ‘disappointing that our Labour Party is not being bolder on what should be done to reverse the damage the Tories’ Brexit deal is inflicting on all of us’. In a hung Parliament, Sir Keir could also come under pressure to back single market membership as the price of a coalition with the Liberal Democrats.
The Labour leader spent years working with Remainers to block the referendum result.
Just days before Britain finally left the EU in January 2020 he said: ‘The argument for a customs union and single market alignment is as powerful now as it was before the election.’ But Labour strategists fear the party’s promeasures
Brussels stance will wreck its hopes of regaining seats in the Midlands and North.
Sir Keir last night said he now believed there was ‘no case’ for rejoining. ‘I want to make Brexit work,’ he said. ‘We want to go forwards, not backwards. This is not about rejoining. It is not about going back into the single market or customs union. We have left the EU, there is no case for returning.’
Former Brexit minister David Jones said Sir Keir’s claim of a Damascene conversion was ‘not credible’.
He added: ‘It is quite clear that if a Starmer-led Labour Party got into government we would end up with some sort of alignment with Brussels which would be even worse than being in the EU.
‘We would be a rule taker, with no influence over the rules we would have to follow. All the benefits in terms of new trade deals and the opportunity to do things differently would be jettisoned.’ Lord Frost, who negotiated the Brexit deal, said that while lower trade barriers were desirable, Sir Keir had failed to spell out ‘what he is going to give up’ to achieve them. He added: ‘Why would the EU make concessions to a party that instinctively adopts EU positions anyway, as it has on the Northern Ireland Protocol?’
Sir Keir set out a five-point plan to ‘make Brexit work’, including to ‘sort out’ the Northern Ireland Protocol and ‘tear down unnecessary trade barriers’.
The Labour leader said he would seek alignment on areas like agricultural goods in order to cut red tape at the border. But the stance risks undermining the UK’s ability to innovate by embracing new technology like gene-editing, which is currently banned by the EU.
Labour said Sir Keir would also seek wider alignment with Brussels across ‘ specified sectors’ which could include manufactured goods. Sir Keir gave little detail on how Labour would fix the problems in Northern Ireland, but said he would enjoy greater ‘trust’ from Brussels than the PM.
A Whitehall source claimed Sir Keir would roll over to Brussels, adding: ‘The fact he’s giving the speech at the Irish Embassy shows where his loyalties lie.’
Labour’s plan would also see Britain’s industries supported by ‘mutual recognition of professional qualifications’ and restored access to funding and research programmes, new security arrangements to defend the nation’s borders, and the delivery of ‘good, clean jobs of the future to our shores’.
‘There is no case for returning’
‘We would be a rule taker’
LIKE St Paul on the road to Damascus, Sir Keir Starmer seems to have experienced a blinding religious conversion.
Formerly an evangelist for Remain – to put it mildly – the Labour leader now claims to be reconciled to Britain’s departure from the European Union.
And should he become Prime Minister (God forbid!), he insists he will not try to unpick Brexit.
What an apparent transformation. Less than three years ago, Sir Keir was so incensed by the British public’s decision to split with Brussels that he battled toothand-claw to block it.
So can we believe a word Starmer says now? Or is this just a cynical ruse to gull pro-Leavers into voting Labour?
We all know he has a loose relationship with the truth. Like all militant Remainers, he’s in favour of democracy unless it doesn’t deliver the result he wants.
Despite solemnly promising to respect the referendum result, he was at the vanguard of the Parliamentary campaign to reverse it, opposing every piece of withdrawal legislation.
He also campaigned for a second referendum and conspired with Brussels’ chief negotiator Michel Barnier to thwart Brexit altogether.
To win Labour’s leadership election, he vowed to keep every Corbynite policy – only to ditch them once in charge.
And when asked to explain his Beergate shenanigans, he has lied and dissembled.
Certainly his radical change of heart on Brexit is at odds with recent outpourings from his front bench.
Only two weeks ago, shadow justice secretary Anna McMorrin told party activists that if in power she hoped Labour would rejoin both the single market and customs union – even hinting at an eventual return to full EU membership.
Sir Keir claims he will negotiate with Brussels to secure a better deal. Good luck with that! The torturous Brexit talks prove the EU is unwilling to be reasonable. And what parts of our new, hard-won sovereignty would he be willing to surrender?
The truth is, the forces of Remain are beginning a fresh guerrilla campaign led by Brussels poster boy Tony Blair.
For all Sir Keir’s protestations, he is with them in spirit. If elected, how long before he conspires to drag us back into the EU?