Daily Mail

New push to stop Stonewall living off taxpayer cash

- By Martin Beckford Policy Editor

PUBLIC sector bodies are to be told to stop giving money to Stonewall after a legal battle raised fears over the group’s influence.

Whitehall department­s have already been told to cut their ties but some have only placed their £2,500 annual membership fees under review.

And the Bank of England, the Armed Forces and Scotland Yard remain signed up to Stonewall’s diversity champions scheme.

An employment tribunal ruled last week that barrister Allison Bailey had been discrimina­ted against by Garden Court Chambers over her ‘gender- critical’ beliefs that no one can change biological sex.

She had objected to her legal chambers joining Stonewall’s diversity scheme and the charity made a formal complaint when she commented on social media about ‘trans extremism’.

All taxpayer-funded organisati­ons will soon be under pressure to cut their ties to the group because both Tories vying to be the next prime minister plan to take a tough stance against it.

A source close to frontrunne­r Liz Truss said: ‘Liz has long believed public sector organisati­ons should withdraw from the Stonewall diversity champions scheme. It does not represent value for money.

‘As prime minister she would ensure government department­s are not participat­ing in the scheme.’ And a spokesman for her rival Rishi Sunak said: ‘Stonewall has become an organisati­on that no public sector body should associate with.’

Stonewall was at the centre of another row last week for claiming that children as young as two could be transgende­r and complainin­g that nurseries ‘teach a binary understand­ing of pre-assigned gender’.

After the message on Twitter caused uproar from MPs and campaigner­s, the charity was forced to issue a clarificat­ion stating it did not work in nursery education and believed pupils should ‘learn about LGBTQ+ identities in an ageappropr­iate and timely manner’.

Stonewall said more than 900 employers were still signed up to the diversity champions programme, receiving advice on how to ‘embed LGBTQ+ inclusion’ at work.

It said more than 200 organisati­ons joined in the year to last November and that overall the scheme was ‘growing in membership’ despite high-profile departures including the BBC, the House of Lords and University College London.

Last week junior minister Brendan

‘Judge, jury and executione­r’

Clarke-Smith confirmed the Department for Education was not funding Stonewall and business minister Lord Callanan said his department was ‘a Stonewall-free zone’.

Yet a spokesman for the Bank of England said: ‘We are still part of the programme – and are continuing to participat­e in 22/23.’

And West Midlands Police, the second-largest force in the country, said it was also signed up.

Sources told the Daily Mail that the Army, Navy and RAF, as well as the Ministry of Defence, will not renew their membership next year.

Former children’s minister Tim Loughton said: ‘Stonewall has been taking the taxpayer for a ride for too long. They act as judge, jury and executione­r of equality policies which they write then enforce.

‘Government department­s are fearful of dropping out of their scheme in case they get marked down by Stonewall.’

Tory MP Mark Jenkinson said last week’s tribunal judgment showed the risk for organisati­ons that took advice from Stonewall.

He added: ‘Taxpayers’ money, at any government level or in quangos, should not be spent propping up an organisati­on like Stonewall who have now been shown to be acting against the interests of those LGB people they were created to protect.’

Women’s rights campaigner Maya Forstater added: ‘This judgment should serve as a warning to other organisati­ons that they could also end up being liable for discrimina­tion payouts.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom