This man c is innocen murder of girls. He is most plaus liar I have interviewe there is no he is a seri

interviewed and by best, I mean he is the most plausible liar. He is incredibly plausible and some people will fall for it.

“He was a handsome fast talking con man with plenty of good looking girlfriends. There was no apparent motive and no reason why he would do this and the hard forensic evidence is limited.

“You can see the charm, he is bigger now than he was, but when he was arrested he was in his late 20s, good looking and very charming, very polite and cool. Why would you murder two girls and three young women?

“The detectives who investigated it are in no doubt that he did it.

“I was there with him for two-and-ahalf hours and I have never sat with a better liar than him, he had an answer for everything. But I didn’t believe – and I absolutely thought he was t to play me. He will be lying abou until the day he dies.”

When you start to dig into evidence, you can see why the jur not fall for Henriquez’s false charm

From the very beginning was co-operative when quest by police, but they were distu by his responses to some of questions.

And in some of his answer revealed details of the case that we public knowledge.

He mentioned a floral design on ca’s underwear that police did not about and a cut to her bra that wa