Daily Mirror (Northern Ireland)

Flags report issues left fluttering in the wind

-

THE Stormont flags commission report has been a predictabl­e waste of time, money and effort.

Five years, £800,000 and 168 pages later, Stormont is still no closer to agreeing a way forward on the intractabl­e disputes surroundin­g flags, bonfires, murals and memorials.

Did anyone seriously expect a different outcome?

As its unwieldy name suggests, the Commission on Flags, Identity, Culture and Tradition faced a dauntingly broad task when it was first establishe­d by the Executive in 2016.

Resolving these annual problems has long evaded our politician­s.

In the end the commission, made up of both political appointees from Stormont’s five main parties and non-political members, was also unable to find consensus on many of the key issues.

No agreement on changing legislatio­n around the flying of flags from lampposts.

No agreement about flags on public buildings.

No agreement on ideas discussed around commemorat­ions, such as a collective “day of reflection” for everyone who suffered during the Troubles.

As the understate­d subheading­s in the report describe it, these are areas “where challenges remain”.

Of the around 45 recommenda­tions that were put forward by the commission, many are vague and overly simplistic.

“The commission agreed that flags supporting paramilita­ry organisati­ons should not be flown,” they wrote with a straight face

With such ground-breaking proposals like these, the flags commission could be renamed the Commission on Stating the Obvious.

There was some consensus on recommenda­tions for bonfires, mainly around tidying up legislatio­n to give safe and inoffensiv­e displays a legal footing.

However, the difficult issue of enforcemen­t received the broadbrush treatment and was not really tackled definitive­ly.

The report was unceremoni­ously published with all the fanfare

Resolving these annual problems has long evaded our politician­s

you would expect group” involving the DUP and Sinn from a midweek, late Fein’s Junior Ministers and Stormont a f t e r n o o n p r e s s officials was formed in a bid release. to agree an action plan on implementi­ng

By that stage we the report. already knew none of This group only met for the first the recommenda­tions time in March. However, no action had any prospect of being enacted plan was agreed. anytime soon, if at all. The longer the delay and the

The report had been completed closer it got towards next May’s 16 months earlier, but was held Assembly election, the more inevitable back from publicatio­n by the first it became that any salvageabl­e and deputy first ministers’ office recommenda­tions in the for“furtherdis­cussion”.a“working report would be unpicked. Sinn

Fein has blamed the DUP, whereas the DUP has pointed to Sinn Fein blocking efforts at Stormont and Belfast City Hall to mark Northern Ireland’s centenary as having soured relations.

Sinn Fein in Belfast unilateral­ly attempting to regulate bonfires while the commission’s findings were still under considerat­ion will not have helped matters. There was no mention of the party’s proposed “public liability insurance” for bonfires in the commission’s report, for example.

The flags report was described by Alliance leader Naomi Long as a “very expensive can-kicking exercise”. After five years and no outcome, many will likely draw the same conclusion.

It is probable that bonfire disputes in particular will be increasing­ly a matter for the courts to resolve. A judgment in September on a contentiou­s interface bonfire in North Belfast offered guidance on a way forward.

In the meantime, disputes surroundin­g flags, bonfires, murals and memorials look set to continue. See you all back here next summer.

 ?? ?? HIGH & DRY Flags report failed to find way forward on disputes
HIGH & DRY Flags report failed to find way forward on disputes
 ?? ?? ANNUAL ISSUE Bonfires remain a bone of contention
ANNUAL ISSUE Bonfires remain a bone of contention

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom