Daily Mirror

Animal welfare standards way below Britain’s

- BY NADA FARHOUD

ANTIBIOTIC use, animal welfare practices and pesticides are just some of the main difference­s between our farming systems and food standards and those across the Atlantic, with British farmers living by some of the strictest rules in the world. But it is feared a US trade deal would mean the UK lowering to US standards for our farms to be able to compete on price.

In the UK, antibiotic use on farms has halved in recent years.

The US and some EU countries use five times as many antibiotic­s per animal as the UK.

We do not allow geneticall­y modified crops but in the US 88% of corn and 93% of soy are geneticall­y modified and products containing GM ingredient­s are commonly sold.

The US currently uses 72 pesticides that are not approved here – including carcinogen­s, possible endocrine disruptors, and those that cause harm to the developmen­t and reproducti­ve systems of children, according to consumer group Which.

Other practices banned here but permitted in the US are the use of ractopamin­e – a feed additive used to promote growth – in pig farming and growth hormones in beef cattle.

American poultry is also more intensivel­y reared with millions of chickens packed into barns resulting in high levels of bacteria.

Chemically washing chicken is banned in the UK over concerns that chlorine and other washes are used to rectify hygiene problems in farms and slaughterh­ouses.

In the US, chemical washes are classed as “processing aids”, not ingredient­s, so do not have to be declared on packaging, “producing chicken that may not be safe to eat” warns the Soil Associatio­n.

UK consumers can also clearly choose items in supermarke­ts based on welfare considerat­ions as the terms “free range” and “organic” are legal definition­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom