Daily Record

RAISE THE RIGHT FLAG

-

to win an interim interdict preventing the SFA from stepping in as arbitrator­s and resolving the row between Ibrox and Hampden’s sixth floor.

And that has killed off any hope of peace breaking out before Rangers celebrate last season’s title ahead of Motherwell’s visit on September 18.

Record Sport understand­s that Scotland’s champions will be sent a design of the official top-flight-winning flag.

But the artwork will be emblazoned by the logo of online car dealers cinch – who have struck an £8m partnershi­p with the league’s governing body – and the club will have the right to turn it down if they feel it breaches their own commercial interests.

Rangers have refused to promote the branding of the firm since the start of the campaign and the row had been passed to the SFA to be resolved at arbitratio­n.

But by going to court, Park – who runs one of the country’s biggest car dealership­s – has brought the process grinding to a halt for the time being.

And if Rangers refuse to accept the official version from Hampden bosses then they may choose to come up with a design of their own for the traditiona­l title ceremony.

A source said: “It’s all becoming a bit farcical. It’s another embarrassm­ent the SPFL could do without after a number of highprofil­e flag-based fiascos over the last few weeks.”

Park’s surprise legal move yesterday has further deepened the rift.

A spokespers­on for Park’s of Hamilton said: “We can confirm Park’s of Hamilton Holdings Ltd has today been successful­ly granted an interim interdict at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, to prevent the SFA from proceeding with its arbitratio­n process.

“For the purposes of Park’s interim interdict applicatio­n, the Court considered the failure to include Park’s went against the SFA’s own rules.

“This ruling prevents the SFA from proceeding with an arbitratio­n process without Park’s of Hamilton being involved.

“We were surprised that both the SFA and SPFL vehemently argued against this petition, despite the fact that their rules clearly state that any arbitratio­n process should feature all interested parties.

“Park’s is proud of its associatio­n with the SFA and Scottish football so it is with regret that we were forced to take this action.

“This is a decision we did not take lightly but felt it had to be made as a matter of principle, to protect the rights of club sponsors throughout all levels of the game.”

The club later issued an statement which read: “Today’s court ruling once again underlines ongoing concerns regarding the corporate governance and leadership of the SPFL.

“We have complied with the SPFL’s own rules but today’s court hearing was one that could easily have been avoided if those responsibl­e had adopted a more consensual and less confrontat­ional approach.

“The Executive of the SPFL required to carry out effective due diligence before entering into its contract with the new league sponsor. Instead, an inadequate and antagonist­ic approach appears to have been adopted; one it is hard to imagine is in the best interests of the SPFL’s member clubs.”

 ??  ?? COURT BID Douglas Park
COURT BID Douglas Park

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom