Why is it just Covid that has restrictions?
THE Government persistently insists that vaccines are the answer to keeping everybody safe. It claims that all the rules it enforces on us are for our safety.
At the same time, members of the Government persistently ignore its own rules. If it believes its own rules are for everybody’s safety, then clearly it does not care about the safety of its own members or anybody else’s.
The Government tells us that the number of Covid cases is consistently increasing, rendering new restrictions necessary. It claims most people are vaccinated and that vaccination defends us against the virus, but cases increase and persist in spite of multiple vaccinations.
Science is about investigating hypotheses with the aim of disproving a theory in order to establish a more accurate understanding. Where is the science in telling us one thing while doing the opposite?
How many boosters will we need to take to remain fully vaccinated and why is this continuing when the evidence shows that cases persist despite the vaccinations?
It is not the case that only the unvaccinated catch the virus? The NHS clearly states vaccination does not prevent catching or passing on the virus.
People may go anywhere they wish with any number of dangerous infectious diseases such as TB, MRSA, MERS, SARS, shingles, flu, ebola. There is no requirement to be vaccinated against any of these.
Why is it only necessary to be vaccinated and restricted for Covid?
People have the right to refuse medical treatment. It is a legal requirement that alternative treatments and potential side effects are communicated to a patient before they accept any medical intervention.
How many people have had the potential side effects of the vaccine and alternative treatments for Covid explained to them?
Peter Binks,
by email