Historic responsibility to tackle emissions

I HAVE recently been intrigued about views expressed on the letters pages of various regional newspapers which seem to be heavily critical of any moves to achieve net zero carbon emissions in the UK.

One of the arguments seems to be that it is pointless for our country to change our ways when other countries, such as China, are expanding their use of fossil fuels. This ignores the fact that we, like several other western countries, are largely responsible for the massive rise in global carbon emissions over the last 200 years.

The UK built up wealth by colonising and plundering other nations and through the industrial revolution, which was fuelled by burning coal. Surely we therefore have a responsibility to take the initiative and show a genuine and effective commitment to achieving net zero? Surely commitment has to start somewhere?

And what would we have to lose anyway?

Quite apart from the reduced pollution, renewable sources such as wind power, though not perfect, are generally quicker to get up and running than any new fossil fuel source. More wind and solar generated electricity and ongoing research into other renewable sources such as wave/water power would lead to more national self sufficiency in fuel supplies.

It is not about “going back to medieval times” – it is about a truly coordinated approach which includes changing our infrastructures and systems in ways which enable people to use less fuel – co ordinated, fit for purpose, cheap public transport systems, properly insulated homes, legislation which requires all new building to be to passivhaus standard, would be a good start. The obvious benefits would include less air pollution, better health, lower fuel bills.

Penny King, by email