Derby Telegraph

Ex-Rams physio sent sexually explicit emails to female patient

- By HELEN KREFT helen.kreft@reachplc.com

A MARRIED former Rams physiother­apist has been suspended from practising over a series of sexually explicit emails he sent to a female patient.

Neil Sullivan, clinical director at Burton Physiother­apy and Spinal Centre, sent messages that “were wholly inappropri­ate and full of sexual innuendo, as well as explicit sexual suggestion­s”.

The revelation­s were made at a Health and Care Profession­s Tribunal Service (HCPTS) hearing after the patient reported Mr Sullivan’s lewd messages. In one email, Mr Sullivan told the patient he likes to “use his hands mostly” so he “can watch the expression­s on the face as the pleasure flows”. She responded it was her idea of “heaven” and there was something “erotic about eye contact”.

Mr Sullivan – the former head physiother­apist for Peterborou­gh Utd, Oxford Utd and Derby County football clubs – then told her “to have a little lay down”. He later admitted in his oral evidence that in this email he was telling the patient to [perform a sexual act on herself ].

In another message he wrote at 10pm one night: “I’ll be the perfect profession­al, as always … unless you tell me not to be”, before signing off for the night at 10.51pm. At one point, Mr Sullivan also pretended he had a twin brother, emailing his patient: “He’s like me ... very useful with his hands.

“Likes to make cheeks glow and eyes roll ... and really appreciate­s a giving kind of girl”. Later the same afternoon he added: “He’d definitely like you to eat him alive.”

Mr Sullivan later admitted he did not have a twin brother and that he was the twin referred to in the emails. In one email exchange he wrote it was “a struggle to concentrat­e on the job at hand” and, in response to further flirtatiou­s emails from the patient, said his twin was “very adventurou­s”, telling her she was becoming his “favourite patient”. Mr Sullivan went on to say he needed a “sub-zero shower” and wrote “my twin is rubbing his hands together now”. The patient met Mr Sullivan after she was referred to his practice by her insurers for physiother­apy as a result of injuries sustained during a road traffic accident in 2019.

She attended around eight appointmen­ts between May and July 2019, which were insurer funded. At the end of the allocated sessions, they both sought approval from her insurer to fund further sessions.

It was during this period they started to exchange messages, the panel heard. They first spoke via Facebook Messenger and then in August moved to email communicat­ion. But the patient ended communicat­ion when she found out he was married. Mr Sullivan then offered free services – allegedly as an inducement to prevent her from making a formal complaint.

However, she reported the matter to the Health and Care Profession­s Council (HCPC) in November 2019. Through his representa­tive, Mr Sullivan told the HCPTS hearing he had provided a full apology to the patient and accepted his conduct was unacceptab­le and amounted to misconduct.

The panel was also invited to consider his email telling the patient he was not single. Mr Sullivan’s representa­tive told the panel the patient was the one who had initiated the pair’s contact. It was also told Mr Sullivan had done considerab­le CPD (continuing profession­al developmen­t) to avoid a repetition. He was described as “a man working at the top of his field with testimonia­ls as to his integrity, kindness, decency and ability.”

The panel was also told this was an isolated incident in an otherwise “unblemishe­d career”. It heard the contact was “consensual” and “he was not predatory”.

The panel concluded that between June and July 2019, Mr Sullivan “engaged in inappropri­ate communicat­ion” with the patient through Facebook which was “flirtatiou­s, highly inappropri­ate and unprofessi­onal”. Over 13 days in August 2019, it found Mr Sullivan engaged in inappropri­ate communicat­ion with the patient via email, stating “these exchanges were inappropri­ate and overtly sexual in nature”. It rejected Mr Sullivan’s evidence that his communicat­ion was an innocent fantasy and concluded his behaviour “fell seriously below” the standards expected of a registered physiother­apist.

The panel’s report adds that he is only now beginning to confront what he did. The panel further notes it was not until 2021 that he told his wife of this incident. Mr Sullivan has now been stripped of his right to practice for six months after the panel concluded: “(He) breached important boundaries, becoming overly close to [the patient] in sessions and then engaging in wholly inappropri­ate sexually explicit messages for sexual gratificat­ion. Although [the patient] was a willing participan­t she ultimately felt humiliated, misled and undermined by the experience.”

I’ll be the perfect profession­al, as always... unless you tell me not to be. What Mr Sullivan said in one email to the patient

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Neil Sullivan
Neil Sullivan

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom