Tugendhat voices support for India in China clash
TORY MP EXPLAINS WHY UK SHOULD STAND WITH DELHI IN MATTERS OF FOREIGN POLICY
TORY MP Tom Tugendhat, chairman of the influential foreign affairs select committee in the Commons, has emerged as one of the strongest supporters in British politics of India and Indians.
He spoke last week of backing India over its recent violent clash with China in the Galwan Valley, in which both Indian and Chinese soldiers were killed, and he also had this to say of the 2.5 million strong British Indian community: “We have a living bridge of very large diaspora community that is just as British as it is Indian.”
Tugendhat emphasised: “It’s absolutely an integral part of the modern United Kingdom to the extent that our chancellor (Rishi Sunak) is part of that community.
“The idea that they’re not British or fully part of the United Kingdom is absurd. Of course, they are. They are absolutely part of the United Kingdom. And the reality is that this demonstrates, I hope, a direction that we should all go in which is Britain standing very, very close to India in matters of foreign policy.”
His comments come at a time when China has warned the UK not to “interfere” in Hong Kong and warned of “consequences” if the deal to allow the Chinese telecoms giant Huawei to build 35 per cent of Britain’s 5G network was cancelled. Prime minister Boris Johnson is under pressure from GCHQ’s National Cyber Security Centre and some 60 Tory MPs to revoke the sensitive deal.
Tugendhat, 47, a Lt Col who served in Afghanistan with the British Army before becoming a Tory MP in 2015, laid a wreath in Delhi in 2018 to Indian war dead in two world wars. Last year he pressed Theresa May, when she was prime minister, to offer a full apology for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre on the occasion of its 100th anniversary.
His committee last year published a landmark report, Building Bridges: Reawakening UK-India ties Contents, which concluded: “The UK is falling behind in the global race to engage with a rising India. Despite strong ties across investment, education and culture – and a shared commitment to democracy and to the rules-based international order – the relationship is not fulfilling its potential. India’s place in the world is changing fast, and UK strategy has not yet adjusted to this new reality. As the UK prepares to leave the EU, it is time to reset this relationship.”
Explaining what “reset” means, Tugendhat said last week: “We’re looking to reset the relationship with India to have a closer relationship because India is a rulesbased nation with very strong principles of the rule of law. It’s a democracy and we have a very, very strong living bridge between our nations.”
He said after the clash in Galwan Valley, the foreign office in London should have issued a stronger condemnation of China.
Instead, the foreign office statement had been disappointingly neutral when it had stated: “Clearly these are concerning reports and we continue to monitor the situation closely. We encourage China and India to engage in dialogue on issues relating to the border – the UK wants to see a peaceful resolution to the current situation. We offer our condolences to the families of those killed.”
Tugendhat said: “Bluntly, I think the statement was too nuanced. I would have been clearer in standing up alongside a long standing ally, partner and friend, India, which has been so outrageously attacked by China, so I have to say I think that was the wrong decision (by the foreign office).”
He went on: “Our strategic partnership lies with free and democratic countries and none more than with India. We don’t only share history, some, some good, some bad, we do share a very deep history with India.”
Asked what kind of relationship India should forge with China, Tugendhat replied: “I’m not going to lecture India in any way, but I hope that India will be a more active member of the rules-based nations around the world and be more participatory in so many of the elements important in keeping us safe, whether that’s an increased diplomatic presence – I would hope that India’s voice is heard more loudly and more clearly around the world – or whether it’s India taking a more active role in some of the operations in the seas that keep navigation free. All of these things I would welcome hugely and I’m a passionate advocate for India to have a permanent seat in the Security Council.”
Meanwhile, the British government has offered sanctuary to nearly 3 million people in Hong Kong with “British National Overseas” status.
Tugendhat underlined its significance: “The reality is that Hong Kong is not simply it’s an entire a geography, operating system based on the skills and the experience of the people. So removing the people fundamentally undermines the economy
in a real sense.”
A survey conducted by his committee had revealed that two thirds of the British people were willing to accept those who chose to leave Hong Kong.
Reminded that British public opinion and especially the Tory Party were hostile to the idea of admitting 30,000 Ugandan Asians with British passports in 1972 – only Edward Heath, then prime minister, took a principled stand – Tugendhat said: “I think Britain is a different country.”
In marked contrast to India, “with China we are trying to work in a reset in the other direction which is to say, look at there is real friction here, there is real tension here. The Chinese Communist Party is aiming at undermining the international principles that have kept Britain and indeed many other countries safe and prosperous for the best part of seven decades.
“We are returning to a relationship that reduces our dependency, that not only allows us to remain engaged but also recognises that dependency on a nation that does not share the rule of law as an essential element of its constitution is a huge vulnerability.”
As for the recent India-China clash, he said: “There are lessons for China and for India. There are lessons for everybody. There’s a real tragedy here and we’re seeing it all over the place that China is beginning to push in ways that’s completely unacceptable and the Galwan Valley is one example. But it is only one. There are many others.” With India, “we have such overlaps of interest that we should deepen that – I’m very, very keen that we do more together. The UK should be standing in defence of the international rules based system and partners who share democracy and common history. We need to be very clear standing up for those values and few countries express them better than India.”