POLICE POWERS: NEIL BASU ON RACISM AND DIVERSITY
TOP ASIAN POLICE OFFICER REVEALS HOW HEALS WITH PREJUDICE AND WHY HIS VIEWS ON FREE SPEECH HAVE CHANGED
BRITAIN’s top south Asian police officer has told a global audience that institutional racism does exist in Britain – contrary to the government’s latest report on racism. Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu of the Metropolitan Police was speaking during the Ramniklal Solanki Pioneers event, organised by the Asian Media Group (AMG), publishers of Eastern Eye and Garavi Gujarat newsweeklies, and the University of Southampton’s India Centre.
Unusually for a senior police officer, Basu was clear that the findings of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities (CRED) did not reflect the reality faced by people of colour in the country.
“I was slightly disappointed that a report was needed in the first place,” he said. “I’m in the space that the recommendations in that report could have been written 30 years ago.
“So, if it doesn’t exist, why would you need those recommendations? The tone of the report is wrong.
“As a senior police officer, of course, I have to be apolitical. The point is, it’s landed very badly. So it’s difficult to see how it has moved us forward in any way, shape or form.”
Basu argued that institutional racism exists in the UK because “I see the fact that it’s very, very difficult to get into some professions”.
On April 20, the equalities minister, Kemi Badenoch, and her Labour shadow, Marsha de Cordova, clashed in the Commons over criticism of the report by antiracism campaigners.
A United Nations’ working group described the conclusions of the review as an “attempt to normalise white supremacy”.
“I have to be honest, one of the worst things I’ve seen in recent years was the unedifying sight of two impressive senior black female politicians shouting at each other from across the despatch box,” Basu added.
“I thought, if that doesn’t put back the cause of equality and diversity and inclusion by years, nothing else will, and it’s all as a result of a bad report with the wrong tone.”
Some in the service say policing remains institutionally racist. They argue that the former chief constable of Kent, Mike Fuller, remains the only black officer to run his own force in the history of British policing. Others, such as Tarique Ghaffur and Patricia Gallan, reached that position when they became assistant commissioners, but neither led their own police force.
In 2008, Ghaffur accused the Met of racism. The case was settled before he took legal action and he signed a gagging clause, as well as leaving the force three months after holding a news conference to make his disquiet public.
Gallan, who retired in 2018, said she had faced “overt and subtle racism” inside the service.
Basu revealed he had his own way of dealing with racism.
“You have to have very thick skin if you’ve got dark skin,” he said he often told his colleagues.
“I don’t look for those microaggressions and slights and faults that some people think you will get.
“I joined in 1992, and I’ve had very little of that kind of behaviour to my face from white colleagues, many of whom did not know who I was.
“I’m also very large, so I’m not easy to intimidate, and I’ve got quite a smart mouth on me and I’m quite bright. So, if you want to take me on, have a go.”
But he agreed the police service was not progressing fast enough.
“The idea that a single individual reaching the top of their profession is going to make a phenomenal difference to society is a bit too simplistic. Quite often it creates a backlash.
“(Barack) Obama’s presidency created a backlash in the United States. And I think it was part of the reason for (Donald) Trump, and he was part of the reason for the very, very obvious rising national, xenophobic, far-right activity in that country.”
Basu is also a champion of diversity and told the audience that he was mentoring and coaching officers who were “white, of colour, gay and straight”.
“I have my own diversity, inclusion and equality strategy,” he said. “I’ve promoted the use of equal merit as a way of selecting people.
“I’ve asked Cress [Cressida Dick, the Met commissioner], and she’s done this. She’s getting some traction on it, to go to government and try and get the equal merit law changed so we can have a policy where we can use that for groups.
“The Met is currently using that policy in its recruitment process.”
Downing Street appointed the CRED panel to investigate racism in the UK after the killing of the African-American black man George Floyd at the hands of a white police officer in Minneapolis last summer sparked off the global Black Lives Matter protest campaigns.
Basu said the killing and subsequent protests “had opened a lot of chief constables’s eyes to the incredible confidence gap in the black community”.
“If I talk to African-Caribbean young men, their confidence gap in policing is very large and not closing. It’s widening,” he said. “We need to do something much better, more effective and take some action to close that gap.”
He revealed that the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) met on April 27 for its first get-together to discuss ways to create greater levels of confidence among black and Asian communities.
Basu’s role on the police chiefs’ council is to lead the counter-terrorism strategy for the whole country, something that weighs heavy on his mind, he said.
“Your mental and physical resilience, for a job where you are 24/7, 365 days a year, on call, wherever you are in the world, in case of a terrorist attack. It’s a brutal life,” he admitted. “It’s a team effort, because the thing that gives me a few hours of sleep every night is the incredible calibre of the people I work with.
“My deputies, the team, they are the people who lead our operational frontline. Those individuals on the frontline are extraordinary people doing an extraordinary job, and if I didn’t have faith in them, I would never sleep. But I do. I think they’re incredible.”
Although MI5 leads on the safety of Britain in terms of national security inside the UK, the police are the agency’s partners who, along with government, sit at the top table.
Basu took over as the national police counter-terrorism lead in 2018. He revealed there have been 12 terror attacks in the UK in the past six years, while the security services have foiled 28 attempts since March 2017 (see box below).
Eight of the plots which were disrupted were by right-wing groups, something that has changed over the past five years, he said. “The [Brexit] referendum had something to do with it, because of course, it generated a spirit of nationalism.”
Basu is fiercely loyal, supporting England, rather than Wales [where his mother is from], against India in sports encounters such as cricket.
“There’s nothing wrong with national pride. But when it becomes jingoism and xenophobia, it creates a permissive environment for the kind of people, the small minority, and they are a minority, of extremists to become much more violent.”
That is why the police have taken action against white extremist and terror groups, such as National Action.
“We’ve imprisoned 17 of their top 20 people,” said Basu. “So, we smashed that organisation because we saw it, and we realised it was gaining traction, and we took action.”
He maintained that right-wing terrorism in the UK was “a relatively small part” of his case work at 10 per cent, but it accounted for a fifth of terror-related arrests. It makes up 40 per cent of the government’s Prevent agenda.
“I can’t tell you whether it’s actually growing or whether it’s because we’ve joined together with the UK intelligence community to target it. We just see more of it,” Basu conceded.
“In other words, have we created more racists, or are we just uncovering the ones who were already there? But we are definitely doing something about it.”
Much of the increase in radicalisation and hate speech is online and on social media. Britain’s most senior police officer for counter-terrorism wants social media companies to do more to stop radicalisation from spreading.
“Where they can do more, and where in the last two years they’ve started to step up, is to use their might and resources to automatically take stuff out before it gets up there,” he said.
“The utopia for me is, you’re trying to post something extremely explicit or violent or criminal online, and their systems pick it up before you can post it and immediately take it down.
“It’s too late if they’ve posted it, because it then gets replicated, and if it goes viral, gets replicated millions of times.”
The problem, he said, was that most social media companies were registered in the US, which has First Amendment rights to free speech and lawful protests.
“The decision about what should be on those sites is probably not a matter for six people in six major companies,” he said.
“I will enforce the laws I’m given to enforce, but it is for society and politicians to debate whether they’ve got that balance right, and to put pressure on social media if they think they haven’t.
“And by the way, over the last three years, the government has seen fit to do precisely that, joining with governments around the world to do that.”
Controversially, however, Basu also wants to lower the bar between freedom of expression comment and criminality. “I don’t think freedom of expression, or free speech, is an unalienable, unassailable, absolute right,” he said.
“There is a responsibility that comes from having the freedom to speak, and that responsibility is you shouldn’t be allowed to do harm.
“Now, we set a bar that says harm is a legal concept. That bar may be too high, and I think we should start talking about what hateful extremism looks like, whether or not the gap between hate crime that we can prosecute, and terrorism, there is a space we have not yet accounted for.”
His views have changed because of what he has experienced over the past six years in his role in counter-terrorism.
“We don’t have a compelling counternarrative to some of the hate speech that’s out there,” he argued.
“Who is out there talking to give the counter-point, the argument for liberal western democracy?
“If you did, you could always guarantee that every time something went viral, went into the public domain or went on mass media, there would be two sides of the argument,” he said.
“I would agree that it would be a much better place to be, and that’s free speech. But you can’t guarantee that, and all you get is a continual reinforcement of one side of the issue. So that’s what worries me the most.”