Eastern Eye (UK)

Pakistan ‘has won’ Afghanista­n war

SPEAKERS AT FT WEEKEND FESTIVAL FOCUSED ON TALIBAN TAKEOVER AND IMPACT ON THE REGION

- Amit Roy

AFGHANISTA­N was the most important subject of discussion at the FT

Weekend Festival last Saturday (4), with the consensus that Pakistan had emerged as the winner and India the loser as a result of the return of the Taliban.

When senior journalist­s at the Financial Times, led by the editor Roula Khalaf, discussed the line to take in a leader comment, columnist Sarah O’Connor spelt it out: “Pakistan has won this war.”

There were reports that the chief of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligen­ce (ISI), Lt Gen Faiz Hameed, had arrived in Kabul, accompanie­d by a delegation of senior Pakistani officials.

FT readers are delighted that the festival – the best thing of its kind – is back in the grounds of Kenwood House after being forced to go digital last year because of the pandemic. This year it was hybrid, with many people travelling to the north London venue, while others followed the discussion­s live online at home.

During one session, “New world disorder”, the Turkish-British novelist Elif Shafak put it very well when she said: “We have to understand this is very grave – what happens in Afghanista­n does not stay in Afghanista­n.”

In Eastern Eye two weeks ago, Neil Basu, assistant commission­er at Scotland Yard, had predicted that the victory of the Taliban might inspire lone wolfs attacks in Britain and elsewhere in Europe, and that Afghanista­n will again become a base for terrorism within two years.

Shafak made sense when she said: “What’s happening has huge impact on India, on Pakistan, on Turkey, and via Turkey, on right-wing politics across Europe; everything is interconne­cted. And it really breaks my heart that women and minorities are always regarded as the casualties.”

On the panel was the BBC’s World News presenter Yalda Hakim, who was born in Kabul and whose family fled during the Soviet–Afghan War when she was six months old.

She said, “From the perspectiv­e of the Afghans, there was a lot of anger directed towards Pakistan. There were accusation­s against Pakistan’s military establishm­ent – that they were perhaps harbouring and providing financing to the Taliban, and they’ve very much been behind the support of the Taliban coming back into power – (that) were never really addressed.

“There was a vague attempt by the (former US president Donald) Trump administra­tion to address those issues, but it was never really implemente­d properly.

“The relationsh­ip between the United States and Pakistan has always been a tricky one. Billions of dollars have been given in dealing with the war on terror, but the results have been very minimal. So I imagine they will be very close allies of the Taliban in this phase.”

Nader Mousavizad­eh, Macro Advisory Partners’ founding partner and CEO – his firm sponsors the FT Festival – agreed with those who hold the US “accountabl­e for the form of exit” from Afghanista­n.

He added: “But let’s make sure we hold a number of other actors accountabl­e. Let’s hold Pakistan accountabl­e for the Taliban itself. Let’s hold a bunch of actors within the country accountabl­e. Let’s hold the Russians and the Chinese (accountabl­e) for what is now being celebrated as a great strategic victory...

“I just want to emphasise I think it’s extremely unlikely that the United States would have gone into Afghanista­n in the first place, and certainly stayed for 20 years, were it not for the fact that the attacks of 9/11 originated from that country.”

His thesis is that the US wanted to get out of Afghanista­n so it could focus on the east. It has looked at the world and analysed that the real competitio­n is posed not by Russia – “it is China”.

Mousavizad­eh did not think India’s relationsh­ip with Afghanista­n “is going to be quite so damaged” by the US withdrawal as most commentato­rs are suggesting.

“I don’t think Indians are terribly surprised either by (the Taliban victory in) Afghanista­n or finding the US eventually was leaving,” he said. UK foreign secretary Dominic Raab was in Pakistan last weekend. He offered £30 million to Afghanista­n’s neighbours, including Pakistan, to help process refugees entitled to come to the UK. The ISI might be happy with a Taliban victory, but Pakistani civil society will not want Afghanista­n’s violent politics spilling over across the border. Afghan refugees streaming across the border is not in Pakistan’s interest. Many years ago, I went to the Pakistan-Afghan border near Landi Kotal with Margaret Thatcher.

“Denis, do be careful,” she called out to her husband, “it’s Afghanista­n down there!”

This was when the Soviets had invaded Afghanista­n. There was a moment of anti-climax when a lone Afghan soldier came to the border

and said affably: “Welcome to Afghanista­n.”

But the Russians finally left, as have the Americans and the Brits.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? CONSEQUENC­ES: Members of the Taliban Intelligen­ce Special Forces guard the military airfield in Kabul; (right) panel discussion at the FT event; and (inset below) Yalda Hakim
CONSEQUENC­ES: Members of the Taliban Intelligen­ce Special Forces guard the military airfield in Kabul; (right) panel discussion at the FT event; and (inset below) Yalda Hakim
 ?? © Frederick M Brown/Getty Images ??
© Frederick M Brown/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom