Evening Standard

Cameron gave ‘shameful’ rises of up to 24% to aides

- Joe Murphy

per cent pay increase from £80,000 in 2014 to £93,000 in 2015.

Ameet Gill, former director of strategy, and Liz Sugg, former head of operations at No 10, received rises of 23 per cent, sending their salaries from £80,000 in 2014 to £98,000 in 2015. Ms Sugg was given a life peerage.

Political adviser Kate Marley went from being on Pay Band 1 in 2014, which is capped at £54,121, to earning £65,000 in 2015, an increase of at least 20 per cent.

Special adviser Nick Seddon, who was awarded an MBE, had an 11 per cent pay rise last year to £88,000.

The rises were branded “shameful” by t axpayer groups and unions. John O’Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “Taxpayers will be shocked at the size of these increases at a time of necessary spending restraint.

“While spads c an help ministers implement their decisions, it’s important to strike a balance.”

Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA union, which represents senior officials, told the magazine: “It would seem hypocrisy knows no bounds from a prime minister who preached pay restraint and austerity to public servants and the public, whilst at the same time awarding double-digit pay rises.”

The revelation­s come a month after it emerged that Mr Cameron ignored concerns by civil service chief executive John Manzoni and handed his staff an extra £282,000 in severance pay after his resignatio­n.

Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services union, told the magazine: “We believe that every civil servant deserves a decent pay rise. It is frankly shameful that David Cameron thinks that this should just apply to his close circle.”

A Cabinet Office spokeswoma­n said: “Decisions about special adviser salaries take into account various factors, including the level of responsibi­lity associated with a particular role and the background and experience of the individual concerned.

“These increases, which were agreed by the then prime minister, reflected changes to the scope and range of responsibi­lity in the roles of a number of special advisers following their reappointm­ent after the 2015 general election.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom