Evening Telegraph (First Edition)
Girl, 14, wins fight to have body frozen
A TERMINALLY ill 14-yearold girl who wanted her body to be frozen in the hope she could be brought back to life won a historic legal fight shortly before dying.
Her divorced parents had become embroiled in a dispute relating to whether her remains should be taken to a specialist facility in the United States and cryogenically preserved.
The girl, who lived in the London area with her mother and had a rare form of cancer, had taken legal action.
She had asked a High Court judge to rule that her mother — who supported her wish to be cryogenically preserved — should be the only person allowed to make decisions about the disposal of her body.
Mr Justice Peter Jackson had made the ruling she wanted in October — following a private hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London — and lawyers say her remains have now been taken to the US and frozen.
The judge had said that nothing about the case could be reported while the teenager was alive, after she said media coverage would distress her. He also ruled that no one involved could be identified — again in line with the girl’s wishes.
She had been too ill to attend the court hearing.
The teenager had been represented by lawyers and had written to the judge explaining that she wanted a chance to “live longer”.
Mr Justice Jackson had also visited her in hospital.
The judge said he had been moved by the “valiant way” in which she had faced her “predicament”.
He said the girl’s application was the only one of its kind to have come before a court in England and Wales — and probably anywhere else.
The judge said the case was an example of new questions science posed to lawyers. He said he had made decisions relating to a dispute between parents — not about the rights and wrongs of cryogenic preservation.
The judge said the teenager had carried out internet research into cryonics during the last months of her life. He said there was no doubt that she had the mental capacity to launch legal action.
A lawyer representing the girl had described her as a “bright, intelligent young person”.
The judge was told that she had pursued her investigations with “determination” even though a number of people had tried to dissuade her.