Evo

TWIN TEST: AUDI RS3 v BMW M 2

- by JAMES D IS DALE| PHOTOGRAPH­Y by ASTON PARROT T

With 394bhp the new Audi RS3 Saloon has no shortage of power, but it will need more than raw pace to match the recently refreshed BMW M2. Exmoor’s damp roads initially seem to favour the all-wheel-drive Audi, but will that be enough?

Audi RS versus BMW M – it’s the needle match that keeps on giving. This time it’s the turn of the new RS3 Saloon, with a heavily revised 394bhp turbocharg­ed five-cylinder, as it takes the fight to the deeply impressive and cosmetical­ly refreshed M2

THE MIST IS ROLLING across the landscape, alternatel­y revealing and then hiding the road ahead. In the moments when visibility is good enough you’ll see that the stretch of tarmac rises, falls and twists with the topography. Look closer still and you’ll discover the route is littered with hidden crests and wickedly deceptive tightening corners. Adding to the fun is the water-logged surface that’s also covered with an alarming mix of fallen leaves and the odd patch of slimy mud. This is Exmoor in autumn. More importantl­y, this is quattro country.

With hindsight, we couldn’t have picked a better spot or better weather to give the new – and first – Audi RS3 Saloon its first proper run in the UK. Underpinne­d by the firm’s famed four-wheel- drive system, the Audi aims to inject a much-needed dose of driver enjoyment over and above the S3 Saloon, which delivers plenty of allweather grip and go but not much in the way of grins.

Driving the changes, literally and figurative­ly, is a heavily revised version of Audi’s turbocharg­ed five- cylinder engine. It’s the same unit used in the TT RS and RS3 hatchback and it features aluminium constructi­on that makes it 26kg lighter than the cast-iron boat anchor previously used. That’s a lot of mass removed from the nose and should go some way to reducing the inert nature of RS3S of old. Better still, despite going on a diet the 2.5-litre five-pot delivers more power, with an increase of 32bhp to a dizzying 394bhp. There’s more muscle too, with peak torque swelling from 343lb ft to 354lb ft, all of which is delivered with an electric motor-like spread from 1700rpm through to 5850rpm.

After it had seen these figures and then peeped out through the curtains and clocked the weather, you’d have forgiven the BMW M2 for hitting the snooze button and staying in bed. Yet the squat, stocky BMW is made of sterner stuff. It’s also recently been treated to a bit of a mid-life refresh, but the changes are merely cosmetic, with new LED headlamps and a tweaked dashboard. This means the M2 makes do with the same twin-turbocharg­ed 3-litre in-line six as before, which at 365bhp is down on power compared with the Audi, but can generate a substantia­l 369lb ft at a ludicrousl­y low 1450rpm. All this poke is channelled through the rear wheels via a limited-slip differenti­al and sevenspeed twin- clutch gearbox (a six-speed manual is available, but the DCT makes

‘Those bulging wheelarche­s stretch over a wider track to give the BMW a junior muscle-car look – you’ll never confuse it with a more humble 2-series’

a fairer comparison with the seven-speed S-tronic- only Audi).

It may be the older car and its updates only minor, but there’s so much the M2 gets right. Those bulging wheelarche­s stretch over the car’s wider track to give the BMW a junior muscle- car look, guaranteei­ng you’ll never confuse it with a more humble 2-series. Inside, you sit much lower than in the Audi, and while the standard seats look rather flat and featureles­s, there’s a wide range of adjustment and plenty of support. There’s no escaping the trademark chunky threespoke M steering wheel, of course, and the lightly revised dash is angled towards you. A neat addition is the new blackpanel dial pack, which appears out of the darkness when you thumb the ignition.

By contrast the RS3 is a much more restrained device, particular­ly in our test car’s battleship grey paint finish. There are some subtle RS add- ons, including unique trim finishers and 19-inch alloys, but in all other respects the Audi looks visually similar to the cheaper S3. The low-key approach continues inside, the RS3 favouring sophistica­tion over sportiness. The high-backed front seats and colourful air-vent surrounds add some interest, as does the new TFT Virtual Cockpit instrument display, but the Audi feels more like an upmarket executive saloon from behind the wheel, whereas the BMW gives off the air of a purpose-built sports coupe.

This feeling is confirmed the moment you get moving. From the light steering to the hushed refinement, the Audi is a laidback companion during daily duties. Sure, the standard passive dampers deliver a firm ride, but it never gets jarring.

Even the five- cylinder motor remains under the radar. There’s a flare of revs and a couple of ‘ look at me’ pops and bangs from the £1000 sports exhaust as it fires up, but under normal circumstan­ces it delivers effortless and unobtrusiv­e progress. It’s helped on this front by the slick dual- clutch ’ box, which when left to its own devices smoothly shifts up as early as possible to make the most use of the engine’s deep- chested torque.

The BMW’S DCT transmissi­on isn’t such a smoothie, determined­ly hanging on to gears when an upchange is due and then

delivering occasional­ly jerky shifts when it does decide to play ball. The straight-six is more vocal for more of the time, its deep baritone a constant acoustic backdrop. The M2 reacts more to the road surface as well, your backside treated to a constant running commentary on the state of the tarmac. Yet as with the Audi, the passively damped BMW never becomes unruly – it’s stiff, but the suspension does a good job of rounding off the jagged edges of the worst road imperfecti­ons.

Even at cruising speeds the BMW’S keener to remind you of its performanc­e potential. On first acquaintan­ce the Audi’s no-sweat steering seems aimed at those who want an easy life when parking, but the BMW’S meatier affair creates an instant connection – you get the impression that this is a car up for a good time.

Which is just as well because the mist is starting to clear now. I’m back in the Audi, keen to see whether the easygoing nature that made the long haul down to Devon such a cinch will prove a hindrance when you want to pick apart your favourite stretch of road. One thing’s for certain – the RS3 is shattering­ly fast.

Squeeze the throttle to its stop in second, third or fourth (it doesn’t really matter which, such is the fivepot’s brawn) and the car takes off like a bazooka shell. It’s helped, of course, by its Haldex- controlled four-wheel- drive system, which allows you to deploy every last ounce of performanc­e, even in these treacherou­s conditions. When we later strap our timing gear onto the RS3 at an equally wet test track, it fires from zero to 60mph in a jaw- dropping 3.7sec. Three point seven. In the wet! In a saloon car!

What’s more, when you work it hard the Audi’s lag-free turbo motor starts to find its voice, helped in no small part by that pricey sports exhaust. Yet it’s not the warbling war cry of a Group B Quattro, but rather a cultured wail that’s not a million miles in timbre, if not volume, from that of the R8’s V10.

‘Sudden crests, big bumps and internal-organ-crushing

When the Audi’s flat- chat in these conditions the BMW struggles to keep up. Traction is better than you’d expect, the M2’s Michelins biting more convincing­ly than on the larger, standard-spec M4 (the M2 laid down a respectabl­e 4.9sec for its wet 0- 60mph run), yet caution is still required. Even with traction control on, the BMW’S tail will twitch and writhe over surface changes and through standing water. This issue is compounded by the DCT transmissi­on, which can’t match the Audi’s seamless shifts and often rams home the next ratio with such a jolt that the rear axle squirms uncomforta­bly with the torque reaction. The manual gearbox alternativ­e offers far more finesse.

Tread carefully, however, and it’s clear the M2 is no slacker. It’s six- cylinder lump doesn’t rev with quite the zeal of the Audi’s unit, but its bassy metallic growl has you chasing the red line whenever the road opens up. And once it’s rolling, the BMW accelerate­s with real purpose, that 369lb ft of torque helping fire the stocky machine along with real conviction.

Even so, with the tarmac still soaked it’s an act of folly to try to lock onto the rear bumper of the Audi, which is devastatin­gly quick across these sinuous Exmoor roads. This particular RS3 is fitted with optional alloys (£695) that have the unusual distinctio­n of being wider at the front than the rear – 8.5 x 19in and 8 x 19in respective­ly (the standard wheel is the latter size allround). As such, the front also gets wider Pirelli rubber – 255-section versus 235. The Saloon’s handling is further boosted by its rear track being 14mm wider than that of the Sportback hatch version, which itself has a rear track 14mm wider than the standard A3’s ( both RS models are broader by 20mm at the front).

As you’d expect, it’s a poised, planted and virtually foolproof device. Simply turn into the corner, plant your foot on the throttle and feel the brilliantl­y effective four-wheel- drive transmissi­on slingshot you down the next straight. Body control is immense, too, with sudden crests, big bumps and internal- organ- crushing compressio­ns failing to knock the Audi off course.

And yet there’s something missing here. The steering is quick and precise,

compressio­ns all fail to knock the Audi RS3 off course’

the optional £4695 carbon- ceramic brakes serve up powerful and progressiv­e stopping power, and the Audi clings faithfully to your chosen line, but it’s just not very exciting. For starters, there’s precious little feel through the steering, and that grippy chassis is not up for getting expressive. You soon learn that a brush of the brakes or sharp lift of the throttle has barely any effect on the Audi’s balance or trajectory.

Yes, the lighter engine means the RS3 is less lazy on turn-in than before, but it’s still a hefty old lump hanging over the front axle. And when really pressing on you can feel the torque vectoring nibbling at the brakes in an effort to keep the Audi on your desired line. There are various driver modes that allow you to alter the steering weight, throttle response and the like, but no matter how much you fiddle, the Audi feels just a bit one- dimensiona­l – although there’s no denying that it’s a brutally effective dimension.

That’s not an accusation you can lay at the wheels of the BMW. It demands more concentrat­ion and respect, but rewards with greater interactio­n and excitement. Compared with its overly complicate­d M4 big brother, the M2 is refreshing­ly simple to get the best from. There are no multiple modes for the dampers (adaptive units aren’t even an option), engine mapping or steering, just the same overarchin­g Eco, Comfort, Sport and Sport+ modes you’ll find on most BMWS. For enthusiast­ic driving it’s that last setting that works best, as it delivers a sharper throttle and a more relaxed stability control.

Even in the wet, the M2 benefits from strong front- end grip, and while the steering lacks some feedback, you know the nose will run wide only if provoked. Keep it smooth and there’s surprising traction, but get greedy with the throttle and the ESP gives you just enough movement at the rear to play the hooligan using the power. You still need to bring your A-game, however, particular­ly with the electronic safety net removed completely, because thanks to its short wheelbase the M2 is spiky when you reach its limits, requiring quick and precise inputs to keep it all pointing in the right direction. However, as the roads dry, the M2 becomes far more confidence­inspiring, allowing you to pick up the pace to the point where there’s virtually nothing in it between it and the RS3.

The BMW is not without its faults. The brakes are a constant frustratio­n, with an initial deadness at the top of the pedal travel that makes them hard to modulate, while the DCT gearbox feels a generation behind the best – it’s never as quick or crisp as the Audi’s S-tronic, or as good as the manual BMW ’ box.

So where does that leave us? Well, the Audi is a hugely impressive piece of kit, and one that should make lots of sense in a country where the weather and road conditions can be so unpredicta­ble – as a startlingl­y capable and low-stress way of getting from A to B as quickly as possible, it’s arguably without equal. Plus it’s home to that magnificen­t engine, one of the best available in any car. Yet while it’s a better machine than all previous RS3S, it’s still rather aloof and detached.

By contrast, the BMW feels like a proper bespoke performanc­e car. It’s flawed, occasional­ly frustratin­g and ultimately not as easy to live with as the Audi, but it draws you into the action and rewards in a way the RS3 can only dream of. If only BMW would develop a Competitio­n Package of the sort that has transforme­d the M3/ M4, the M2 could really ascend to greatness.

‘As a low-stress way of getting from A to B quickly, the RS3 is arguably without equal’

 ??  ??
 ?? AU D I RS 3 SA LO O N v B M W M 2 ??
AU D I RS 3 SA LO O N v B M W M 2
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Above: going to extremes to break the RS3’S grip; revised five-pot turbo motor is 26kg lighter than previously; cabin comfortabl­e and well-made. Right: M2 happy to play the hooligan; turbo straight-six sounds superb; cabin understate­d
Above: going to extremes to break the RS3’S grip; revised five-pot turbo motor is 26kg lighter than previously; cabin comfortabl­e and well-made. Right: M2 happy to play the hooligan; turbo straight-six sounds superb; cabin understate­d
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? AU D I RS 3 SA LO O N v B M W M 2 ??
AU D I RS 3 SA LO O N v B M W M 2

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom