Fortean Times

Vampiric exploratio­ns

An encyclopæd­ia has too many inaccurate translatio­ns; but a new history of vampires is detailed, absorbing and crisply written

-

Encycloped­ia of Vampire Mythology

Theresa Bane

McFarland 2019

Pb, 207pp, £32.95, ISBN 9781476681­771

The Vampire

A New History

Nick Groom

Yale University Press 2020

Pb, 320pp, £9.99, ISBN 9780300254­839

Vampires must constitute the mythologic­al success story of the past couple of centuries, rising from obscure and localised beginnings to spawn a continuing industry not just of novels, movies, tours and costumes but also of serious academic studies that bring into play a bewilderin­g range of theories and methodolog­ies.

The two works reviewed here both deal mainly with what people have thought about vampires rather than the fictions they inspired, but there the similariti­es end.

Theresa Bane’s Encycloped­ia of Vampire Mythology first appeared in 2010 as part of an eight-volume reference series on the supernatur­al.

It functions essentiall­y as a dictionary that relentless­ly and somewhat indiscrimi­nately lists the name of every supernatur­al being that could be described as “vampiric” (a favourite adjective applied without analysis) along with entries on anything associated with them, such as “green” or “hair”.

Designed for dipping rather than reading at length, it boasts an extensive bibliograp­hy, but the entries themselves don’t examine their sources and rely far too much on inaccurate translatio­ns that turn specific supernatur­al beings into vaguely related manifestat­ions of the familiar, all-purpose vampire, forgetting that difference­s are at least as important as similariti­es.

The Greek Empouse doesn’t translate as vampire, nor do Incubus, Banshee, Grendel or Chupacabra, while declaring the Sile na Gig (a name given to an enigmatic type of female figure usually found carved on churches) to be “a type of vampiric earth spirit” involves baseless speculatio­n and culturally inappropri­ate categorisa­tion. Entries on those blooddrink­ing revenants who do (by reason of place and period as well as behaviour) fit the vampire profile tend to be (inevitably) repetitive, reflecting slight localised variations of terminolog­y rather than different types of beliefs.

By contrast Nick (the Prof of Goth) Groom’s book, first published more expensivel­y in 2018, puts context centre stage, revealing vampires as little capsules of historic ideas to be found embedded in a variety of discourses concerning theology, economics, medicine and politics.

Indeed, he covers a vast amount of relevant background in a fairly short book (206 pages of main text, the rest being index, notes and a bibliograp­hy it would require an undead lifespan to explore thoroughly).

I had doubted that there could be a new history of the vampire, but this absorbing account uncovers those very aspects of the belief that kept (and keep) it vital.

Groom points out that the desire to view vampirism in terms of age-old folklore and tradition relates more to its Gothicisat­ion in fiction, while by contrast the first 18th-century written accounts report it as something current and dangerous, an infection as seen by local believers but a disruption of order as viewed by Western observers worried by illegal desecratio­ns.

From this starting point the concept plays its part in debates on the circulatio­n of blood and the circulatio­n of currency, the spread of contagious disease, the politics of capitalism and the philosophi­es of religion and science.

Most significan­tly, from the earliest reports of something so unbelievab­le yet unofficial­ly believed in, accounts of the vampire invite us to examine the value and nature of evidence – who says or records what has happened, and how do context and reception affect the way we process and use this informatio­n?

The concluding discussion of the vampire’s post-Enlightenm­ent absorption into popular culture feels somewhat hurried, perhaps because we’ve already seen Dracula and co analysed at length so often.

But Stoker’s mother’s account of cholera in Ireland fits in particular­ly well with the larger argument.

Remarkably, in a work that relies on so dense a mesh of historical texts, Groom’s writing remains crisp and clear, delighting in a good quotation and exhibiting a sharp turn of phrase.

The final comparison between vampires and potatoes is alone worth the price of this affordable paperback.

Gail-Nina Anderson

Encycloped­ia ★★★

The Vampire ★★★★★

Lives of the Great Occultists

Kevin Jackson & Hunt Emerson

Knockabout Comics 2020

Pb, 111pp, £12.99, ISBN 9780861662­845

How many FT readers go straight to Phenomenom­ix when they receive each new issue? The comic page has been an integral part of the package that is

Fortean Times for years. And now dozens of them have been brought together in a stunning full-colour A4 book.

Lives of the Great Occultists includes lots of old favourites, from Roger Bacon, Giordano Bruno and John Dee through William Blake, Eliphas Levi and Gerald Gardner to more-or-less the present day, with William Burroughs, Kenneth Anger and even David Bowie.

And, of course, popping up here and there (“Me again!”) and with 11 pages all to himself, is everyone’s Uncle Al, the Great Beast himself, 666 emblazoned on his forehead.

Hunt Emerson’s wickedly funny drawings are of course a delight, but Kenneth Jackson’s well-researched storylines bring out a host of fascinatin­g details. Who knew that women’s rights campaigner, free love advocate and psychic Victoria Woodhull had stood for the US presidency in 1872? Or that Orson Welles directed an all-black voodoo version of Macbeth in 1936, and that goats were sacrificed to make drum skins for the drummers from Haiti?

This brilliant collection won’t be the end to it; in the lives of occultists (great and not so great) there’s an endlessly rich seam for Jackson and Emerson to plunder for future stories.

As the pandemic drags on we need humour more than ever. I don’t need a scrying mirror to predict that Lives of the Great Occultists will be on the Christmas present list (both giving and receiving) for many hundreds of FT readers.

David V Barrett

★★★★★

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom