Glasgow Times

Appeal issued over bus franchisin­g bill

- Stewart Paterson stewart. paterson@ eveningtim­es. co. uk

THE multi- million- pound bill for pursuing bus franchisin­g in Glasgow should be met by the Scottish and UK government­s, according to a councillor.

Malcolm Mitchell,

SNP councillor for SNP Garscadden/ Scotstounh­ill, has put down a motion supporting the decision by SPT this month to explore introducin­g the system where services would be franchised and operators told what services to run how often and what fares to charge.

The model, it has been argued, will improve the reliabilit­y and affordabil­ity of the buses, but one major operator has said they will fight it through the courts if necessary.

It has been estimated that it will cost around £ 15 million to do preparator­y work before a franchisin­g system can be put in place and takes around five to seven years.

It is then believed to require between £ 45m and £ 85m a year extra in public subsidy to implement franchisin­g.

Mitchell’s motion asks the council to write to the Scottish Government to request funding for the initial cost.

It states: “Exploring franchisin­g is likely to require very significan­t public investment.”

He suggests: “The city convenor for transport and city centre recovery write to both UK and Scottish Government­s to outline the Council’s support for exploring bus franchisin­g in Greater Glasgow and to seek their financial support for the franchisin­g exploratio­n process.”

Franchisin­g does not mean a public- owned bus company, instead private operators would be contracted to run specific services and under conditions set by the local transport authority.

Councillor Mitchell blamed the deregulati­on of the bus network in the 1980s on a decline in bus passengers in Glasgow.

Operators however argue that the speed of journeys and congestion has been a major factor in people choosing alternativ­e methods of transport. They have argued that buses need extra space on the road to allow more journeys to be congestion- free.

Mitchell’s motion, which will be debated this week, argues public control will help deliver a better- connected transport system.

It states: “Bringing bus services into greater public control could deliver opportunit­ies to enhance the multi- modal integratio­n of Glasgow’s public transport network, including through alignment with a new Clyde Metro scheme.”

He also said the move has widespread political support, adding there is: “Crossparty support for exploring franchisin­g, with 83 out of 85 councillor­s at the Glasgow City Council elections in 2022 being elected on manifesto commitment­s to explore greater public control of Glasgow’s bus network.”

Last week, however, McGill’s Bus owners said franchisin­g was “theft” of their business and they would resist it.

Sandy Easdale, said he and his brother James were preparing a legal team to contest franchisin­g and would “fight it with every penny” he has.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom