Rwanda refugee deal treats human beings like flotsam

Glorious Gloucestershire This picture of the East Window in St Peter’s Church, Winchcombe, was taken by Esmond Lane

THE huge outpouring of compassion by Stroud residents for Ukrainian refugees contradicts the frequent assertions made by our local MP that her constituents support stronger curbs on the arrival of asylum seekers on our shores.

We are horrified that the Home Secretary is thrashing out a deal with Rwanda which would remove single men who arrive on our shores by boat to so-called “processing centres” in Rwanda.

Indeed, under this scheme both Ukrainians and Afghanis (who may have worked as translators for the British but failed to get on the last plane out) who become desperate and seek to arrive via the channel could meet the same fate.

It is a farce to suggest that such a scheme would “break up the criminal gangs” operating in the channel – a similar scheme operated by the Australian government proved highly costly to taxpayers and totally failed to curb such criminal exploitation.

Single men, many of whom will have been victims of torture and other trauma, will be left completely isolated and vulnerable with little recourse to legal representation, and even more at risk if they are gay.

This Government’s total disregard for the UN Refugee Convention is already evident in their proposed Borders and Nationality Bill – soon to become law and which would criminalise anyone arriving by small boat, making them liable to imprisonment and expulsion; criminalising the victims of trafficking rather than the traffickers.

We feel ashamed that the UK’S long history of support for human rights has become so eroded by this Government, that human beings can now be considered like so much flotsam to be “expelled” to foreign shores.

We urge all those showing such compassion for the plight of Ukrainians to speak out about this issue as well.

Liz and Martin Whiteside

Thrupp

AS we have the solicitor general Mr Alex Chalk MP on our patch, with a sub-1,000 majority, I watch with interest for his reaction to and behaviour after, the announcements that the two residents in Downing Street have been found to have broken the law.

The first EVER incumbents of the two greatest offices of states to be so charged.

Surely a resigning matter for them and/or Mr Chalk?

Karl Morris Cheltenham

Surely this situation is a resigning matter?

made the announcement about Rwanda.

Johnson knew that it would draw much attention away from his mounting list of indiscretions, outraging some while pleasing others within a particular target audience.

I suspect that he knows the policy is likely to be hugely expensive, totally unworkable and arguably against international law, but that won’t matter.

In fact I sense that deep down he would welcome legal challenges, as when the policy fails he will try and blame the failure on those that opposed it – just as he did with his disastrous Brexit deal that’s costing the UK billions.

Perhaps the most tragic thing is that his target audience will again largely believe him, either because he’s telling them what they want to believe or they just don’t make the effort to research and understand the actual facts.

No wonder that many other nations view us as a country on a downward spiral.

Jas Quedgeley