Hamilton Advertiser

CARE PLAN ROW SNP accused of trying to railroad through changes Council leader says everyone aware of £18m vision

- Nicola Findlay

A row has broken out over South Lanarkshir­e Council plans to transform social care.

As reported, the council wants to close Kirkton, Mcwhirter and Canderavon homes in the Hamilton area and replace them with community care hubs as part of a new £18 million threeyear vision.

The scheme has been road tested at East Kilbride’s Meldrum and Mckillop Gardens – and a paper was due to be tabled at the council’s social work resources committee last Wednesday.

However, both the Labour and Conservati­ve council groups accused the SNP minority administra­tion of trying to “rush through” plans to shut homes.

They claimed they weren’t given adequate time to scrutinise the paper outlining plans; and were sent it less than 24 hours prior to when it was due to be tabled.

The item was ultimately withdrawn but the council and its leader John Ross said a briefing was held for all councillor­s a week prior to the meeting.

Tory Group leader, Councillor Alex Allison, said: “Councillor­s of all parties should have time to study the proposals, hear from their constituen­ts, raise questions and properly scrutinise the plans, so that ultimately the right decisions are made.

“This matter affects the lives of some of our most vulnerable residents. It is too important to be rushed through.

“South Lanarkshir­e has a minority SNP administra­tion that claims to be committed to transparen­cy and openness, but that simply doesn’t fit with bringing forward such significan­t proposals only the night before a committee meets.

“We could never consider such an important matter under those circumstan­ces, so it is right they backed down and will now allow proper scrutiny.” A Labour group spokespers­on said: “It is no understate­ment to say that these are the biggest changes to older people’s care in the 22-year lifetime of this council yet the SNP were quite prepared to railroad sweeping reforms through a single committee as an item of urgent business with only a few hours notice and without proper consultati­on.

“That is no way to make policy and Labour councillor­s will not stand for it.”

But Councillor Ross hit back and said: “All elected members were provided with a detailed briefing on April 18 with time for questions and discussion.

“The proposals were well received and some follow-up discussion­s took place. Based on this positive response the decision was taken to add the paper to the social work committee meeting agenda on April 25.

“The paper was essentiall­y the briefing provided a week earlier.

“Other parties raised concerns and asked for more time to understand the details of the proposals. We were happy to accommodat­e their request and removed the item from the agenda.”

A council spokesman added: “Briefing sessions a week before the social work committee meeting were followed up by the presentati­on and a full briefing note being sent to all 64 elected members. These clearly outlined the approach being proposed.

“Care home residents and their carers were informed immediatel­y after councillor­s had been briefed.

“While reports are normally published five working days before any council meeting, because elected members had already been briefed on the plans it was believed that it would be acceptable to send the report to committee members the day ahead of the meeting and then table it on the day.

“The aim was to avoid any delay in implementi­ng a plan that had been well-received across the spectrum and which is designed to guarantee that we continue to provide the best possible care for elderly people.”

 ??  ?? Detailed briefing Council leader John Ross
Detailed briefing Council leader John Ross
 ??  ?? In the news Our report
In the news Our report

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom