Fear­ing for fu­ture of coun­cil ser­vices

Harefield Gazette - - OPINION - MISS T CAMP­BELL Fairdale Gar­dens Hayes LINDA PERKS Re­gional Sec­re­tary UNI­SON Greater Lon­don Re­gion

mak­ing them feel closer and less iso­lated.

It’s about time it was taken more se­ri­ously with more sup­port for vic­tims who can lose their con­fi­dence and feel in­tim­i­dated and more lonely with­out their keep­sakes to spur them on as it’s an in­va­sion of pri­vacy, which can prove un­set­tling. HUGE spend­ing cuts pro­posed by the Con­ser­va­tives could see many coun­cil-run ser­vices dis­ap­pear within the next five years.

Coun­cil cuts in Lon­don mean women flee­ing do­mes­tic vi­o­lence be­ing turned away from refuges, a lack of street light­ing plung­ing com­mu­ni­ties into dark­ness, and chil­dren’s cen­tres, li­braries, parks, and po­lice sta­tions be­ing closed. Less cash for lo­cal gov­ern­ment means peo­ple pay more for park­ing, so­cial care, births, deaths and mar­riages, as well as buri­als and cre­ma­tions.

The Prime Min­is­ter has said that only £1 in ev­ery £100 of gov­ern­ment spend­ing would be cut in the first two years – but this claim sim­ply does not stand up to scru­tiny. Fig­ures from the last Bud­get show that £26.6bn is set to be cut – £6.53 in each £100 spent this year, then a fur­ther £5.57 next year.

Only last week coun­cils were told they are to lose £7.18 out of ev­ery £100 they re­ceive in public health grants.

If the gov­ern­ment has its way lo­cal ser­vices that coun­cils are not legally obliged to pro­vide will start to dis­ap­pear. Pest con­trol, mu­se­ums, al­lot­ments, youth ser­vices and sports cen­tres could be­come things of the past, while coun­cils will find it in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult to pro­vide statu­tory ser­vices such as so­cial care and child pro­tec­tion. It’s time to give lo­cal coun­cils respite from the aus­ter­ity axe.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from UK

© PressReader. All rights reserved.