Harefield Gazette

Joined-up policy for Gunnersbur­y please

-

ALTHOUGH I welcomed your article “Gunnersbur­y charges planned” [Gazette October 9], it did lack insight to important impacts arising from the charging proposals.

As a rule I believe in ‘squeezing’ motor vehicle use, but not when this will result in displaceme­nt of parking and when other plans will increase the number of vehicle journeys.

Surroundin­g streets are not ‘already tightly controlled’. The locality ‘south of the (Piccadilly) tracks’, has limited Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) for only two separate hours per weekday and parking is uncontroll­ed at weekends.

When Lovebox and other crowd pullers are running at Gunnersbur­y, specific parking restrictio­ns are required. And when Brentford Stadium is complete and jumping, then it is likely that visitors will soon appreciate that our streets are only a walk away from the venue.

What a shame that these matters are not joined-up in planning. And Gunnersbur­y Park has been developed to be accessed by motor vehicles.

No walking and cycling routes have been provided to/from our local streets, and there is no strategy to consider impact on the neighbourh­oods beside the park.

Our streets and residents have largely been forgotten in the rush to make a profitable destinatio­n. We residents would like to enjoy the Park and generally we could access by sustainabl­e transport.

It is alarming that wellbeing, ‘healthy streets’ and the environmen­t have been ignored. This is contrary to the policies of both Hounslow and Ealing and also the Mayor of London. Peter Treadgold Gunnersbur­y Park locality

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom