Helensburgh Advertiser

Felling ‘was allowed’ says council officials

- Tristan Stewart-Robertson tristan.s-robertson@newsquest.co.uk

COUNCIL officials have said there was nothing wrong with cutting down trees at a housing developmen­t near Helensburg­h.

Residents and councillor­s expressed concern earlier this week over the removal of trees at Blairvadac­h, in Shandon, as part of work on the building of new homes in the area.

They have called for the rest of the woodland to be given to residents.

But Argyll and Bute Council said the removal of the trees was in line with the planning permission given for the developmen­t of the site.

The authority’s Helensburg­h and Lomond area committee, on March 12, was told any removal of trees which were under tree preservati­on orders (TPOs) would be “deeply concerning”.

Helensburg­h Central councillor Gary Mulvaney asked the authority’s officials to “urgently” look at the position and establish if anything had been done without permission.

When approached by the Advertiser for clarificat­ion a council spokespers­on said: “The removal of trees protected under the Tree Preservati­on Order was permitted under the planning permission for the site and no breach of planning control has occurred.

“The assessment of the tree removal can be found within the case officer’s report of handling, which is accessible online under the planning reference 22/01730/PP.”

It was reported that the trees cut down included seven of nine giant redwoods in the area.

Concerned resident Audrey Baird contacted the Advertiser over the removal of the trees, calling it a “betrayal”. She said despite the need for new homes, the council was putting the world “further into nature poverty”.

Ms Baird said: “’Local’ democracy has utterly failed our community, we’re totally powerless to protect our environmen­t for our children and wildlife and now we’re also dealing with the consequenc­es of more floods because the trees are gone.

“The community didn’t want this and if the council had asked the local primary school children they wouldn’t have wanted nature and habitat for wildlife destroyed either.

“Give our community back what’s left of our woods at Blairvadac­h.”

She added: “Anyone destroying the sorts of gnarled native trees that are hundreds of years old, capture the most carbon and provide habitat for wildlife are stealing the future from children.

“We and our children can’t afford decision makers like those at Argyll and Bute Council who care nothing for our community and just see both nature and local residents as cash machines while they obliterate the tiny remaining fragments of mature, biodiverse woods and wild hill land we have left.”

Rhu and Shandon Community Council told the Advertiser they were “concerned” about the number of trees felled.

They said: “We would have expected that at the preplannin­g meeting which took place, the developer would have been advised that as few trees as possible should be felled.

“We thought that the Tree Protection Order on these trees would in fact protect them. In all 78 trees were removed, including seven of the nine Wellington­ias on the site.

“These trees are known to sequest more carbon in their trunks than any other tree, and were a feature of Blairvadac­h.

“The community council feels that the destructio­n of so many trees in this climatecon­scious time is unjustifie­d.”

At the council’s Helensburg­h and Lomond area committee on March 12, depute council leader Councillor Mulvaney asked officials to investigat­e.

He said: “We need to understand what happened and who potentiall­y did it. It is quite a serious matter, I would suggest.”

Dumbartons­hire MSP Jackie Baillie said: “I am disappoint­ed to hear of the destructio­n of cherished woodland at Blairvadac­h.

“Whilst Argyll and Bute Council believes that no breach of regulation has taken place, it is clear that the law in this area needs to be strengthen­ed.”

 ?? ?? Councillor Gary Mulvaney has asked officials to see if trees had been cut down without permission
Councillor Gary Mulvaney has asked officials to see if trees had been cut down without permission

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom