Helensburgh Advertiser

Questions raised over the ‘need’ for retail space at waterfront developmen­t

- Andy Galloway andrew.galloway@newsquest.co.uk

FEARS over leakage of shoppers’ spending from Helensburg­h to other areas are “a fallacy”, a local resident has claimed.

Fiona Baker questioned councillor­s over the perceived need for the waterfront site, in front of the town’s new leisure centre, to be sold to the highest bidder.

An Argyll and Bute Council report on the bidding process for the site had stated that nearby Dumbarton and Alexandria were “progressin­g with town centre commercial developmen­ts”, and warned there was “a risk that Helensburg­h may see further expenditur­e leaking to these centres if no action is taken”.

But a council official told Ms Baker, pictured right, that there was more than the financial aspect of the sale being considered, while another remarked that mixed use was “key” to the developmen­t.

The discussion took place at a meeting of Argyll and Bute Council’s Helensburg­h and Lomond area committee on Tuesday, March 12.

Earlier in the meeting, Councillor Graham Hardie (Liberal Democrat, Helensburg­h Central) claimed that his own research had found that 75 per cent of Helensburg­h retailers were in favour of a retail developmen­t at the waterfront.

Ms Baker then asked: “In light of the recent eye-watering 10 per cent council tax increase during a cost of living crisis, and Argyll and Bute council having £96 million in reserve, why is there continued insistence the pierhead site must be sold off to the nearest bidder?

“It seems with all this extra income, there is no need to put a retail developmen­t on the site which we do not want or need.

“Councillor Hardie’s anecdotal 75 per cent of retailers wanting a retail developmen­t is incorrect.

“The retail study, for all its flaws, points out Helensburg­h is ahead on retail but behind on leisure. There will always be leakage, but there is leakage from other areas to Helensburg­h for specialist shops.

“Thinking that a new supermarke­t will not stop leakage is a fallacy. A communityf­ocused developmen­t and a real investment in the town centre could proceed with the funds available.

“Will the council clearly demonstrat­e that it is not purely a fiscal issue?”

David Allan, the council’s estates and property developmen­t manager, said: “The waterfront site is a mixed use site.

“The council has invested over £20 million in the leisure centre and while I am not a Helensburg­h person, if I look at investment over the last decade, in the Civic Centre and Hermitage Park, there has been a lot of investment.

“I think it is mixed use that is key to the developmen­t.”

Ross McLaughlin, the authority’s head of commercial services, added: “On the open space, there are a number of open spaces in Helensburg­h, and today is not about selecting one preferred bidder.”

Ms Baker then said: “I was going to mention Rothesay Pavilion and the amount of money being spent on that, but it has been said that is the best commercial value. This site does not have to be sold for £1million it can be sold for £1.”

Mr McLaughlin responded: “Money is not the only considerat­ion. We have criteria based around transport, legal and governance issues as well as financial outcomes.”

It seems with all this extra income, there is no need to put a retail developmen­t on the site which we do not want or need

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Helensburg­h Leisure Centre with the waterfront developmen­t site behind it. Image: Contribute­d
Helensburg­h Leisure Centre with the waterfront developmen­t site behind it. Image: Contribute­d

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom