Hinckley Times

Single authority proposals are attacked as ‘hugely disruptive’

Hinckley councillor says decision-making will be further away

- NICHOLAS DAWSON nicholas.dawson@reachplc.com

DISSOLVING the county’s district and boroughs into a single authority would be “hugely disruptive”, a councillor has warned.

Hinckley county and borough councillor Michael Mullaney has warned that Leicesters­hire County Council’s proposal for a single administra­tion would be a “time-consuming distractio­n” from the coronaviru­s outbreak.

Papers have been published for the county council’s Cabinet meeting this Friday, September 18.

These include a report supporting the abolition of the seven boroughs and districts in Leicesters­hire and their replacemen­t with one administra­tion for the county.

If it is passed, Conservati­ve county council leader Nick Rushton will write to the Secretary of State for local government, Robert Jenrick, to try and push on with the unitary plans.

Proposed next steps include refreshing the strategic business case which sets out the benefits of re-shaping local government in Leicesters­hire.

Drawn up last year, the blueprint concluded that one, single unitary council – bringing together the eight county and district councils – offered the best opportunit­y to save money, reduce duplicatio­n and protect frontline services.

Cllr Rushton said: “Now is the time for change. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunit­y to simplify services, save over £30m a year and improve lives.

“Simply put, it’s the right thing to do. The long-term financial situation facing councils is bleak.

“Unitary is the new normal – with the Government encouragin­g councils to bring forward proposals. And let’s seize the chance to ramp up our approach to Covid-19 recovery.

“It also means we can put the East Midlands on the map. We’re expecting the Government to make reorganisa­tion a condition for devolution.

“And with leaders in Nottingham­shire and Derbyshire also working towards reform, we can unlock the possibilit­y of a regional devolution deal – the 6Cs model – establishi­ng a mayoral combined authority for the East Midlands, bolstering our ability to attract much-needed Government investment and level up the region.

“Doing nothing isn’t an option. Residents want easy access to effective, joined-up services – and be able to shape decisions that affect their communitie­s.

“The current set up is bureaucrat­ic, expensive and confusing – and we must put residents first and shake up the system.

“Exploring unitary puts us in control of our future and is our opportunit­y to move Leicesters­hire forward.”

In response, Cllr Mullaney said: “Plans for one unitary authority for Leicesters­hire will mean decisionma­king being taken further away from local people.

“One authority for Leicesters­hire’s 700,000 population will mean communitie­s like the one I represent in Hinckley on the edge of the county feeling even more remote from decision-making.

“The outgoing Conservati­ve local government minister, Simon Clarke, even admitted that any new unitaries should only be between 3-600,000 unless they are one united community, such as a single city.

“Given Leicesters­hire’s population is around 700,000 and given that it is a large sprawling geographic­al county of many varying towns and villages, Leicesters­hire is clearly too big and too diverse to be squeezed into one authority.”

Cllr Mullaney added: “Abolishing Hinckley and Bosworth and the other boroughs and districts in Leicesters­hire would be a hugely disruptive, time-consuming distractio­n at a time when people are trying to get through the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Getting through Covid-19 must be the top priority that occupies people’s time and effort.

“I therefore call upon the Conservati­ve Government and county council to drop their disruptive plans for one unitary authority for Leicesters­hire.

“Liberal Democrats in Leicesters­hire will oppose these plans as a total distractio­n at this time of national emergency.”

 ??  ?? ANGRY: Michael Mullaney
ANGRY: Michael Mullaney

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom