Hinckley Times

There is no right of appeal for us villagers

-

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough has been swamped with complaints from Stoke Golding residents after the council’s planning committee approved an applicatio­n from Glenalmond Developmen­ts for the constructi­on of 65 houses on green belt land on the edge of the village. In total, the council received 46 complaints about the meeting and the conduct of individual councillor­s during the meeting.

Some 375 villagers tuned into the planning committee meeting on December 8 to listen to proceeding­s via a You Tube link, but were incensed when Lib Dem members of the Committee voted en bloc to approve the applicatio­n with little or no considerat­ion of the evidence that had been presented to them by the village community. The applicatio­n had generated over 400 objections from local residents but the developer had failed to consult with any village representa­tives or the community in general.

The decision flew in the face of Liberal Democrat pledges to protect green spaces within the borough and led many to question whether those voting in favour were properly representi­ng the interests of the local community.

Both Labour and Conservati­ve committee representa­tives all opposed the approval.

Salt was further rubbed into residents’ wounds when at the same meeting the committee refused a similar applicatio­n for 120 houses at Ashfield Farm, Desford, on grounds nearly identical to the objections that had made to the Stoke Golding applicatio­n.

Desford is located in a ward represente­d by Liberal Democrat members; Stoke Golding is part of a Tory held ward. Chair of the planning committee is Councillor Joyce Crooks, who is a member for Newbold Verdon with Desford and Peckleton.

Steve Martin, chair of the Friends of the Community group, which coordinate­d the opposition to the Roseway, commented: “The decision is a real kick in the teeth for the local community who were near unanimous in their opposition.

“There were some very positive comments from some councillor­s about the quality of the objection we put together but, in the end, it counted for nothing. It just shows how little influence the local community has on planning matters.”

Local resident and fellow member of the Friends of the Community Group, Jacquelyn Jones, said: “The system seems to be stacked against those who are most impacted by these decisions and there is little we can do as a community if our local representa­tives refuse to stand up to bullying developers.

“This decision is especially disappoint­ing given that the Liberal Democrats

claim as a party to be the defenders of villages and their green spaces.”

From my perspectiv­e and that of most other Stoke Golding residents, the frustratin­g thing is that the community appears to have nowhere else to go in opposing this developmen­t.

Had the applicatio­n been refused, the developer could have appealed the decision but there is no similar right of appeal for the community.

We are stuck with a decision made by a group of politician­s who have no interest in Stoke Golding.

None of those who voted to approve the applicatio­n had even bothered to visit the site yet they feel able to play politics with people’s lives.

I hope for the sake of other village communitie­s that the council’s Liberal Democrat councillor­s start to recognise they have a responsibi­lity to represent all members of the community.

Nick Robinson, Stoke Golding resident and former Lib Dem voter

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom