History of War

OPERATOR’S HANDBOOK Medium Mark A Whippet

The Medium Mark A Whippet tank complement­ed heavier British tanks with battlefiel­d speed & firepower

- WORDS MIKE HASKEW

Inside Britain’s WWI engineerin­g marvel

Following the introducti­on of the tank to the battlefiel­d at the Somme in autumn 1916, British tacticians realised that the armoured vehicles might indeed breach German lines and end the stalemate on the Western Front in

World War I. However, due to their slow speed and ponderous weight, their heavy Mark I, IV and V tanks were incapable of rapidly exploiting these initial gains, which allowed the enemy to re-establish defensive positions quickly.

The solution was the

Mark A Medium Whippet.

In relative terms, the Whippet was conceived as a medium tank that operated as battlefiel­d cavalry, rapidly pouring through breaches in enemy lines created by the heavy tanks and sowing chaos in rear areas. Utilising speed and four mounted machine guns that covered a 360-degree field of fire, the Whippet was a resounding success.

The origins of the Whippet lay with engineer William Tritton, a pioneer in British tank developmen­t. In October 1916, Tritton proposed to the British military’s Tank Supply Committee a lighter, faster tank that would take advantage of battlefiel­d breakthrou­ghs achieved by the heavy tanks. A month later, the concept of the ‘Tritton Chaser’ was approved. The prototype was ready by the following spring and field trials were conducted in March at Oldbury, near Birmingham.

Subsequent­ly, Field Marshal

Sir Douglas Haig, commander of the British Expedition­ary Force in France, personally ordered the production of 200 Whippets, for delivery at the end of July.

The first operationa­l Medium

Mark A tanks were delivered to F Battalion of the Tank Corps in December 1917. Production was limited to only 200 tanks and concluded in the spring of 1919, as rival designs were conceived to supplant the original Whippet. All were manufactur­ed at the Wellington Foundry of William Foster and Co. Ltd., in the East Midlands city of Lincoln.

“BRITISH TACTICIANS REALISED THAT THE ARMOURED VEHICLES MIGHT INDEED BREACH GERMAN LINES AND END THE STALEMATE ON THE WESTERN FRONT IN WORLD WAR I”

“SIZABLE MUD CHUTES ALONG THE FLANKS AND REAR CHANNELLED MUD AWAY FROM THE ROLLERS AND TRACKS, IMPROVING MOBILITY”

DESIGN

The Whippet design included shorter tracks, which dispelled the belief that the tracks had to be as long as the hull in order to ensure maximum capability to exit shell holes or traverse trenches. Sizable mud chutes along the flanks and rear channelled mud away from the rollers and tracks, improving mobility. The fuel tank was forward in the chassis, which was originally unsprung. In

1918 Colonel Philip Johnson modified a Whippet, adding traverse leaf springs beneath the hull and a V-12, 360-horsepower Rolls-royce Eagle aircraft engine, increasing top speed to 48 kilometres per hour (30 miles per hour). However, these modificati­ons were too costly for production.

“THE GUNS WERE REMOVABLE FROM THEIR INTERNAL MOUNTS”

ARMAMENT

The light Hotchkiss M1909 machine gun was manufactur­ed in Britain with the label ‘Mark I’, and 40,000 were completed. The Medium Mark A Whippet was armed with four of the .303-calibre weapons, with a maximum range of 3,800 metres (4,160 yards) and a rate of fire of up to 600 rounds per minute. The Hotchkiss was gas-operated and air-cooled. Fed by a 30-round strip initially and later by belt, it was sometimes prone to jamming, and parts were difficult to replace. The guns were removable from their internal mounts, and occasional­ly a fourth crewman was aboard the Whippet to operate one or more of the weapons.

“COMBINED WITH THE ACRID ODOUR OF GUNPOWDER, THE NOXIOUS FUMES WERE CAPABLE OF INCAPACITA­TING CREWMEN AT TIMES”

ENGINE

The Tylor Co. traced its origins to the mid 18th century. Its twin four-cylinder, side-valve JB4 petrol engines powered the Medium Mark A Whippet, generating a combined 90 horsepower and a top speed of 13.4 kilometres per hour (8.3 miles per hour). The Whippet’s performanc­e was more robust than heavier tanks, particular­ly considerin­g its comparable weight of 14 tons. The Tylor JB4 engine was similar to those that powered the double-decker buses through the streets of London, and each engine was paired with one of the Whippet’s tracks. A complex steering system controlled the throttles of each engine, allowing the driver to execute turns.

CREW COMPARTMEN­T

Early considerat­ions for the Whippet involved a rotating turret, but that idea gave way to a fixed, polygon-shaped crew compartmen­t, raised to the rear of the chassis and incorporat­ing vision slits. Inside, the compartmen­t was cramped, dark and noisy. Heat from the engine often created extremely high temperatur­es inside. The compartmen­t was situated behind the engines, and exhaust fumes regularly trailed inside via its ventilatio­n system. Combined with the acrid odour of gunpowder, the noxious fumes were capable of incapacita­ting crewmen at times. The three-man crew consisted of a commander, gunner and driver, who sat forward and steered by means of a wheel. Although space was limited, sometimes a fourth crewman was added.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? British crewmen pose atop the turret of a Whippet during exercises. The tank proved a valuable asset as the Allies attempted to break the stalemate on the Western Front
British crewmen pose atop the turret of a Whippet during exercises. The tank proved a valuable asset as the Allies attempted to break the stalemate on the Western Front
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? This Whippet demonstrat­es the tank’s capability to traverse a muddy landscape. The Whippet employed shorter tracks than other tanks, improving earlier designs
This Whippet demonstrat­es the tank’s capability to traverse a muddy landscape. The Whippet employed shorter tracks than other tanks, improving earlier designs
 ??  ?? Soldiers relax by their Whippet tank somewhere near the front lines. The tank fulfilled its mission of exploiting breaches in enemy defences with rapid mobility The Whippet became a distinctiv­e sight on the battlefiel­d, with its turret at the rear of the chassis and twin engines forward of the crew compartmen­t The Whippet stood high off the ground, its squared turret constructe­d of riveted plates to provide protection against smallarms fire
Soldiers relax by their Whippet tank somewhere near the front lines. The tank fulfilled its mission of exploiting breaches in enemy defences with rapid mobility The Whippet became a distinctiv­e sight on the battlefiel­d, with its turret at the rear of the chassis and twin engines forward of the crew compartmen­t The Whippet stood high off the ground, its squared turret constructe­d of riveted plates to provide protection against smallarms fire
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Four French-designed Hotchkiss .303-calibre machine guns, manufactur­ed under licence in Britain as the Mark I, were installed aboard the Whippet
Four French-designed Hotchkiss .303-calibre machine guns, manufactur­ed under licence in Britain as the Mark I, were installed aboard the Whippet
 ??  ?? A Whippet sits idle on the Western Front while a crewman reclines adjacent to the turret
A Whippet sits idle on the Western Front while a crewman reclines adjacent to the turret
 ??  ?? The Tylor Co. built the JB4 petrol engines that powered the Whippet. Two of the engines were mounted in each vehicle and proved quite reliable
The Tylor Co. built the JB4 petrol engines that powered the Whippet. Two of the engines were mounted in each vehicle and proved quite reliable
 ??  ?? The cramped crew compartmen­t of the Whippet subjected its occupants to the acrid combinatio­n of spent gunpowder and exhaust fumes
The cramped crew compartmen­t of the Whippet subjected its occupants to the acrid combinatio­n of spent gunpowder and exhaust fumes

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom